• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Archive by Category

Articles in Patents

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
May 19, 2013 – 4:24 PM | 7231One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F05%2F19%2Fbowman-decision-a-win-for-big-business%2FBowman+Decision+a+Win+for+Big+Business2013-05-19+20%3A24%3A07Marcus+Childresshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D7231
Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
April 28, 2013 – 12:01 AM | 72063 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F04%2F28%2Foxycontin-and-the-implications-of-pay-for-delay%2FOxycontin+and+the+Implications+of+Pay-For-Delay+2013-04-28+04%3A01%3A10Lana+Khouryhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D7206
Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
The Effects of “Isolation”: Will the Supreme Court be convinced that “isolated” genes are patent eligible?
April 25, 2013 – 12:01 AM | 71972 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F04%2F25%2Fthe-effects-of-isolation-will-the-supreme-court-be-convinced-that-isolated-genes-are-patent-eligible%2FThe+Effects+of+%E2%80%9CIsolation%E2%80%9D%3A++Will+the+Supreme+Court+be+convinced+that+%E2%80%9Cisolated%E2%80%9D+genes+are+patent+eligible%3F++2013-04-25+04%3A01%3A01Kristin+Lockharthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D7197
The Effects of “Isolation”:  Will the Supreme Court be convinced that “isolated” genes are patent eligible?

The Supreme Court will decide in June just how much human manipulation is involved in “isolated” gene sequences.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Vringo Seeking Royalty Rate Increase
April 24, 2013 – 12:01 AM | 71938 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F04%2F24%2Fvringo-seeking-royalty-rate-increase%2FVringo+Seeking+Royalty+Rate+Increase2013-04-24+04%3A01%3A56Melissa+Grosetthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D7193
Vringo Seeking Royalty Rate Increase

Vringo Inc. is appealing a federal court decision awarding it damages and future royalties from its suit against Google, AOL, and other companies for patent infringement, seeking an increase on the dollar amount awarded and an increase in the running royalty rate.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Privateering: Should Companies Embrace the Patent Troll System?
April 22, 2013 – 1:00 AM | 7179One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F04%2F22%2Fprivateering-should-companies-embrace-the-patent-troll-system%2FPrivateering%3A+Should+Companies+Embrace+the+Patent+Troll+System%3F2013-04-22+05%3A00%3A50Tom+Matikainenhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D7179
Privateering: Should Companies Embrace the Patent Troll System?

Some companies see patent trolls as the bane of their existence, while others see them as a weapon to be used against competitors.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Apple Faces Lawsuit in China over Siri
April 21, 2013 – 3:00 PM | 71676 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F04%2F21%2Fapple-faces-lawsuit-in-china-over-siri%2FApple+Faces+Lawsuit+in+China+over+Siri2013-04-21+19%3A00%3A49Avie+Zhaohttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D7167
Apple Faces Lawsuit in China over Siri

Shanghai Internet technology company Zhizhen brought suit against Apple, Inc., claiming that Apple’s Siri infringed on its patent for “Xiaoi,” a chat robot system. Specifically, Zhizhen contends that Siri’s core technology—man-machine interaction—is based on the word chat robot system which Xiaoi patented.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Covered Business Methods Post-Grant Review: The First Six Months
April 21, 2013 – 12:01 PM | 71743 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F04%2F21%2Fcovered-business-methods-post-grant-review-the-first-six-months%2FCovered+Business+Methods+Post-Grant+Review%3A+The+First+Six+Months2013-04-21+16%3A01%3A36Mark+Patrickhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D7174
Covered Business Methods Post-Grant Review: The First Six Months

On April 12, the Intellectual Property Brief held its 2nd Annual Symposium with one segment focused on the Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents, how this alternative to complex civil litigation has fared so far, and how it will be used going forward.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Happy Birthday Twitter IPA!
April 16, 2013 – 4:33 PM | 71413 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F04%2F16%2Fhappy-birthday-twitter-ipa%2FHappy+Birthday+Twitter+IPA%212013-04-16+20%3A33%3A34Marcus+Childresshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D7141
Happy Birthday Twitter IPA!

April 17th marks the one year anniversary of Twitter’s Innovator’s Patent Agreement (IPA). The agreement was created to remedy the string of patent wars, but has received sharp criticism from shareholders and managers.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
NEW APPROACH IN PATENT TROLL FIGHT: RACKSPACE GOES ON THE OFFENSIVE
April 15, 2013 – 12:44 PM | 7116No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F04%2F15%2Fnew-approach-in-patent-troll-fight-rackspace-goes-on-the-offensive%2FNEW+APPROACH+IN+PATENT+TROLL+FIGHT%3A+RACKSPACE+GOES+ON+THE+OFFENSIVE2013-04-15+16%3A44%3A03John+Langloishttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D7116
NEW APPROACH IN PATENT TROLL FIGHT: RACKSPACE GOES ON THE OFFENSIVE

Rackspace is going after alleged Patent Troll IPNav by actively filing suit against them to try and limit their ability to bring future patent suits against Rackspace.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Are Human Genes Patentable?: Supreme Court to hear Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Oral Argument
April 13, 2013 – 12:01 AM | 7015One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F04%2F13%2Fare-human-genes-patentable-supreme-court-to-hear-association-for-molecular-pathology-v-myriad-genetics-oral-argument%2FAre+Human+Genes+Patentable%3F%3A+Supreme+Court+to+hear+Association+for+Molecular+Pathology+v.+Myriad+Genetics+Oral+Argument2013-04-13+04%3A01%3A50IP+Brief+Staffhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D7015
Are Human Genes Patentable?: Supreme Court to hear Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Oral Argument

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on April 15, 2013 in the Myriad case, which asks whether human genes are patentable.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Page 1 of 2212345...1020...»Last »

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Recent Posts

  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License