Articles in Featured
The Walt Disney Corporation has 90 days to investigate and to file a notice of opposition to Deadmau5’s recent trademark request for his mouse-like headdress.
On Tuesday, ESPN Boston reported that the PTO no one organization or individual owns the phrase “Boston Strong” and likely never will. In rejecting the applications, the examining attorney reasoned that “because consumers are accustomed to seeing this slogan or motto commonly used in everyday speech by many different sources . . . the mark fails to function as a trademark.”
Following an approval by the U.S. International Trade Commission to investigate allegedly infringing Monster headphones, Bose has filed a complaint in Massachusetts federal court, claiming infringement for the very same patent covering its in-ear headphone design.
The privacy implications of Google Glass have influenced a recently published patent application from Bill Gates.
News is starting to spread about Google’s next-generation contact lens technology, a mere day after the technology giant offered Google Glass for sale to the public in a limited-time promotion.
Apple opted out of investing in Intellectual Ventures’ patent acquisition fund, a move that some are calling “a dramatic departure” from (what used to be) the norm.
Heartbleed Bug is to Blame for Recent Cyber Security Breach.
What do you do when you can’t figure out who has standing under the Lanham Act? Make a new rule! At least, that’s what the Supreme Court did in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
After three tests confused all Circuit Courts and plaintiffs alike, a unanimous Supreme Court created a clearer rule and affirmed the decision to give Static Control their chance at justice. Read about it here.
The “Innocence of Muslims” saga is far from over as Garcia and Google continue to fight it out in court.
WCL Alumnus publishes article, “The Surprising Breadth of Post-Grant Review for Covered-Business-Method Patents: A New Way to Challenge Patent Claims,” in the Spring 2014 edition of the Columbia Science and Technology Law Review.