• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Archive by Author

Articles by Kathleen Hudik

Kathleen Hudik is a 3L at Washington College of Law and a Senior Blogger for the Intellectual Property Brief. She is primarily focusing her studies on trademark, copyright, and administrative policy. Graduating with honors from Villanova University in 2009 with a degree in English, Kathleen went on to serve as an AmeriCorps volunteer in St. Louis, Missouri where she was a literacy tutor and marketing intern for a national veterans’ nonprofit organization. Originally from southwestern Pennsylvania, Kathleen is excited to make Washington, DC her new home.

Aaron’s Law: Why Reforming the CFAA Solves Very Little
February 6, 2013 – 12:49 AM | 67073 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F02%2F06%2Faarons-law-why-reforming-the-cfaa-solves-very-little%2FAaron%E2%80%99s+Law%3A+Why+Reforming+the+CFAA+Solves+Very+Little2013-02-06+05%3A49%3A54Kathleen+Hudikhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D6707
Aaron’s Law: Why Reforming the CFAA Solves Very Little

Legislators attempt to rein in the expansive Computer Fraud and Abuse Act after Aaron Swartz’s tragic suicide, but what is the net effect?

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Tim Tebow’s Monopoly on Prayer: Confusion Surrounding “Tebowing” and the Reach of Trademark Protection
November 5, 2012 – 1:00 AM | 62632 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F11%2F05%2Ftim-tebows-monopoly-on-prayer-confusion-surrounding-tebowing-and-the-reach-of-trademark-protection%2FTim+Tebow%E2%80%99s+Monopoly+on+Prayer%3A+Confusion+Surrounding+%E2%80%9CTebowing%E2%80%9D+and+the+Reach+of+Trademark+Protection2012-11-05+06%3A00%3A33Kathleen+Hudikhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D6263
Tim Tebow’s Monopoly on Prayer: Confusion Surrounding “Tebowing” and the Reach of Trademark Protection

Tim Tebow’s trademark application for “Tebowing” is published by the US Patent and Trademark Office. The Internet proceeds to forget what a trademark registration protects.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
“Best Coffee in America?” The USPTO Doesn’t Think So.
October 12, 2012 – 1:01 AM | 60836 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F10%2F12%2Fbest-coffee-in-america-the-uspto-doesnt-think-so%2F%E2%80%9CBest+Coffee+in+America%3F%E2%80%9D++The+USPTO+Doesn%E2%80%99t+Think+So.+2012-10-12+05%3A01%3A57Kathleen+Hudikhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D6083
“Best Coffee in America?”  The USPTO Doesn’t Think So.

The USPTO will likely reject Dunkin’ Donuts recent trademark application for “Best Coffee in America” slogan and it has nothing to do with taste.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Holy War: 11th Century Knight Orders Duke It Out Over Trademark Infringement in Florida
September 25, 2012 – 1:00 AM | 5977One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F09%2F25%2Fholy-war-11th-century-knight-orders-duke-it-out-over-trademark-infringement-in-florida%2FHoly+War%3A+11th+Century+Knight+Orders+Duke+It+Out+Over+Trademark+Infringement+in+Florida2012-09-25+05%3A00%3A23Kathleen+Hudikhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5977

The Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit files trademark infringement ruling in case between two Crusades-era military orders, stating willful blindness is not a factor in determining fraud on the Trademark Office.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
“Everything Comes from Nature”: Federal Circuit Splits Hairs to let Myriad Split Genes
August 19, 2012 – 3:56 PM | 5805One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F08%2F19%2Feverything-comes-from-nature-federal-circuit-splits-hairs-to-let-myriad-split-genes%2F%E2%80%9CEverything+Comes+from+Nature%22%3A+Federal+Circuit+Splits+Hairs+to+let+Myriad+Split+Genes2012-08-19+19%3A56%3A03Kathleen+Hudikhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5805
“Everything Comes from Nature”: Federal Circuit Splits Hairs to let Myriad Split Genes

After the Supreme Court remanded the case for consideration after itsPrometheus decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upholds Myriad Genetic’s patent rights to two human genes and the test to detect them.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Beer Does Not a Party Make: Coronado Brewing Co. Blames the Lawyers
July 24, 2012 – 8:43 AM | 5703No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F07%2F24%2Fbeer-does-not-a-party-make-coronado-brewing-co-blames-the-lawyers%2FBeer+Does+Not+a+Party+Make%3A+Coronado+Brewing+Co.+Blames+the+Lawyers2012-07-24+12%3A43%3A14Kathleen+Hudikhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5703
Beer Does Not a Party Make: Coronado Brewing Co. Blames the Lawyers

After quickly resolving a trademark infringement complaint over the phone, Coronado erroneously believes it will share a beer with the brewery it attempted to sue.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Posner Speaks [Again] on Patent Reform: A Critique
July 18, 2012 – 3:39 PM | 567010 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F07%2F18%2Fposner-speaks-again-on-patent-reform-a-critique%2FPosner+Speaks+%5BAgain%5D+on+Patent+Reform%3A+A+Critique2012-07-18+19%3A39%3A01Kathleen+Hudikhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5670
Posner Speaks [Again] on Patent Reform: A Critique

Dear Judge Posner, Please consider the negative unforeseen consequences of your recommendations to rid the patent system of negative unforeseen consequences.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
A Frustrated Posner Has Spoken: Apple v. Motorola Dismissed With Prejudice
June 25, 2012 – 10:26 AM | 55634 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F06%2F25%2Fa-frustrated-posner-has-spoken-apple-v-motorola-dismissed-with-prejudice%2FA+Frustrated+Posner+Has+Spoken%3A+Apple+v.+Motorola+Dismissed+With+Prejudice+2012-06-25+14%3A26%3A13Kathleen+Hudikhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5563
A Frustrated Posner Has Spoken: Apple v. Motorola Dismissed With Prejudice

In a decision filed June 22, Judge Richard Posner dismissed Apple’s request for an injunction after neither party’s counsel was able to establish any actual harm, ending, temporarily Apple’s crusade against Motorola’s Android.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Campaign for Chang(ing our Branding Strategy): Obama Campaign Sues D.C. Website for Trademark Infringement After Unauthorized Use of Rising Sun Mark
June 10, 2012 – 10:12 PM | 5463One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F06%2F10%2Fcampaign-for-changing-our-branding-strategy-obama-campaign-sues-d-c-website-for-trademark-infringement-after-unauthorized-use-of-rising-sun-mark%2FCampaign+for+Chang%28ing+our+Branding+Strategy%29%3A+Obama+Campaign+Sues+D.C.+Website+for+Trademark+Infringement+After+Unauthorized+Use+of+Rising+Sun+Mark2012-06-11+02%3A12%3A42Kathleen+Hudikhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5463
Campaign for Chang(ing our Branding Strategy): Obama Campaign Sues D.C. Website for Trademark Infringement After Unauthorized Use of Rising Sun Mark

In a complaint filed June 1, President Obama’s campaign claims that DC-based DemStore.com has been selling merchandise bearing the campaign’s logo without permission. However, these claims come years after the campaign learned of DemStore’s unauthorized use, raising questions about how a changing political strategy can impact trademark enforcement.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Ludicrous Penalties for Ludacris? Sony BMG v. Tenenbaum
May 31, 2012 – 9:24 AM | 5392No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F05%2F31%2Fludicrous-penalties-for-ludacris-sony-bmg-v-tenenbaum%2FLudicrous+Penalties+for+Ludacris%3F+Sony+BMG+v.+Tenenbaum2012-05-31+13%3A24%3A54Kathleen+Hudikhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5392
Ludicrous Penalties for Ludacris? Sony BMG v. Tenenbaum

The Supreme Court refuses to consider constitutionality of six-figure statutory damages imposed against an individual consumer in Sony BMG v. Tenenbaum.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Recent Posts

  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License