• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Archive by Author

Articles by Jason Sokel

Jason Sokel is a 2L at the American University Washington College of Law, also pursuing a Masters of Business Administration at the Kogod Business School. Jason received a bachelors degree in economics from New York University. Jason is a member of the American University Business Law Review and a member of the Business Law Society. Jason is interested in intellectual property law, specifically patent and trade secret issues.

AndroGel: A Pay-for-Delay Question
March 16, 2013 – 12:01 AM | 6898No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F03%2F16%2Fandrogel-a-pay-for-delay-question%2FAndroGel%3A+A+Pay-for-Delay+Question2013-03-16+04%3A01%3A04Jason+Sokelhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D6898
AndroGel: A Pay-for-Delay Question

On March 25 the Supreme Court will be hearing oral arguments on the FTC v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a case about Pay-for-Delay agreements between innovative and generic pharmaceutical companies, to decide if these agreements are anticompetitive or merely supporting patent monopoly rights.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
MGA’s Bratz Dolls Survive Another Lawsuit
December 20, 2012 – 12:01 AM | 6472One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F12%2F20%2Fmgas-bratz-dolls-survive-another-lawsuit%2FMGA%E2%80%99s+Bratz+Dolls+Survive+Another+Lawsuit2012-12-20+05%3A01%3A08Jason+Sokelhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D6472
MGA’s Bratz Dolls Survive Another Lawsuit

The Second Circuit affirmed MGA’s summary judgment motion, determining that their Bratz dolls do not violate Belair’s copyright, as the aesthetics of the doll are not substantially similar to Belair’s Angel/Devil Girls photograph.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Voter Verified: Does Your Vote Count?
November 11, 2012 – 5:20 PM | 6307No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F11%2F11%2Fvoter-verified-does-your-vote-count%2FVoter+Verified%3A+Does+Your+Vote+Count%3F2012-11-11+22%3A20%3A19Jason+Sokelhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D6307
Voter Verified: Does Your Vote Count?

Voter Verified v. Premier Election Solutions involves a patent infringement case for voter machines. Specifically it considers the elements that constitute prior art and whether Voter Verified provided enough evidence to prove Premier infringed upon its claims.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
JPK Paris 75: A Geographically Deceptive Mark
October 10, 2012 – 12:01 AM | 6066No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F10%2F10%2Fjpk-paris-75-a-geographically-deceptive-mark%2FJPK+Paris+75%3A+A+Geographically+Deceptive+Mark2012-10-10+04%3A01%3A13Jason+Sokelhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D6066
JPK Paris 75: A Geographically Deceptive Mark

The Federal Circuit affirms the District Courts refusal to register the mark “JPK PARIS 75″ on grounds that it is primarily geographically deceptive and, as such, violates the Lanham Act.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
  • Oh, That’s Different … Never mind: USPTO Withdraws Ruling that IPAD MINI is “Merely Descriptive”

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License