• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Articles, Columns, Copyright, Daily Blog, Featured

Twitter RPG Stealing Copyrighted Online Art

Submitted by Priya Mahajan on January 3, 2013 – 4:59 AM65235 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F01%2F03%2Ftwitter-rpg-stealing-copyrighted-online-art%2FTwitter+RPG+Stealing+Copyrighted+Online+Art++2013-01-03+09%3A59%3A17Priya+Mahajanhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D6523

Self-described “lazy RPG” Tweeria works by players creating new adventures, killing monsters, or winning items every time a user posts on Twitter. Recently, the game has come under fire for misappropriating original artwork and using it as part of the game, often without any sort of attribution to the artist.

By automatically moving the user forward in the game every time he or she tweets, Tweeria requires almost no direct interaction from its users, making it popular on Twitter as a social game. The role-playing game currently has 14,000 registered users and receives almost 20,000 visits per day and Tweeria creators even have a mobile version of the game in the works. However, much of the art used in the game is taken from other sources on the Internet, including World of Warcraft and DeviantArt. The art is often used and even sold as part of the game, with no recognition or profits given to the original artist, a clear violation of copyright law.

DeviantArt’s copyright policy states that copyright infringement includes “placing a photograph or creative work online without proper permission,” “using a creative work commercially,” “adapting a creative work of one medium to another…” and “modifying or editing a creative work without proper permission.” However, Tweeria’s parent company, Tweenk, may not have directly lifted artwork from online sources like DeviantArt. The game developers accept photos submitted by users, who are unlikely to check the copyright policy underlying each photo. This is a likely cause of the rampant copyright infringement on Tweeria.

After the news spread about all the copyright-infringing material related to the game, the Tweeria website was taken down. The site later returned, but this time, there was a disclaimer at the bottom of the page:

“Based on World of Warcraft image files and texts. Artworks by Blizzard, Sony Online Entertainment, Kerem Beyit, Brandon Kitkouski, Tyler Walpole, Derk Venneman, Hee Won Lee. All rights belong to their authors.”

Despite this acknowledgement of rights holders, a good deal of material still on the site is alleged to be copyright infringing. One of the game’s creators replied to these allegations by releasing the following statement:

“Up to this moment I have already deleted plenty of pieces of unauthorized art and will continue to do so. On the other hand I’ve got some permissions from authors and feel that people generally want to contribute their works into the project…It takes much time to check all the license limitations for each artwork. As the result and unfortunately for gamers, I’ve closed the option for artworks uploading and got massive delay in approval of small items.”

While the game’s creator complains of the “massive delay” in artwork approval, many of the artists whose material was stolen in blatant violation of copyright law are still waiting for their misappropriated material to be taken down or attributed to them.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Priya Mahajan

Priya Mahajan is a 2L interested in IP Law and Real Estate Law. She is currently interning with FEMA. Priya holds a BS in Logistics and Supply Chain Management with a Collateral in International Business from The University of Tennessee. She is originally from Cookeville, Tennessee and her interest in IP law stems from interests in technology and cyberlaw.

Priya Mahajan has written 11 posts for the IPB.

65235 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2013%2F01%2F03%2Ftwitter-rpg-stealing-copyrighted-online-art%2FTwitter+RPG+Stealing+Copyrighted+Online+Art++2013-01-03+09%3A59%3A17Priya+Mahajanhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D6523 »

  • joshua wattles says:
    January 4, 2013 at 1:18 AM

    I am intellectual property counsel to deviantART. Artist members of deviantART own all rights to their respective works. nWhile deviantART obtains non-exclusive rights to display their work on the deviantART site, the artist retains all other rights and, in fact, are free to remove works from deviantART at any time. No third parties are ever licensed by deviantART to use artworks placed on the site by artists unless it is for promotional purposes. We have no licenses outstanding to Tweeria. Of course, artists who have work on deviantART might license the game to use the artwork as a matter of individual choice.

    Reply to this comment »
  • Long Beach movers says:
    April 20, 2013 at 4:57 AM

    This page really has all of the information I wanted concerning this subject
    and didn’t know who to ask.

    Reply to this comment »
  • haleybuckner says:
    April 25, 2013 at 9:02 AM

    On the one hand, they clearly went over the line. On the other hand, I'd really like it if a lot more people put their art in the public domain (creative commons). If you're not intending to sell it for money, why cling to the rights on it? More people will see and enjoy your art if it can be re-used / re-purposed / mashed up in other people's work.

    Reply to this comment »
  • chris landry says:
    April 26, 2013 at 1:16 AM

    I really didn't know about this. I will take a look more about it.

    Reply to this comment »
  • Lucas says:
    April 30, 2013 at 2:07 AM

    Yes, you are right, copyright is an issue, on Twitter, Pinterest …. everywhere, especially with "world of warcraft". I am working on a blog for wow brasileiro and did my best to search and use images which are free to use.

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D printing is the hot new topic in the tech world and with it come some possible issues related to safeguarding intellectual property. This two part post evaluates the possible issues that may arise due to 3D printing and why there isn’t any cause for alarm, yet.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Lindecent Proposal: The Race to Trademark “Linsanity” Greater Protection in China?: China’s Intellectual Property Rights Developments in 2011 South Africa’s Movie Piracy Challenges Publishers Revising Their Views on DRM “If you use ‘Xerox’ the way you use ‘zipper,’ our trademark could be left wide open.” “Careful! That is [Trademark Dilution]”: Louis Vuitton Sues Warner Brothers over “The Hangover Part II” Electronics Giants Fight it Out: LG v. Sony Target’s Expansion Into Canada Stymied by Prior Trademark Holder Sippy Cup Fight Spills Over To The CAFC.  CAFC Tells Appellant To Listen To Your District Court. Google v. oogle: Search Engine Loses UDRP Proceeding PIJIP: The Intersection of Intellectual Property, Trade, and Development Unconstitutional Excess, and other Recent Copyright Developments Copyrights and the Fashion Industry: A Love-Hate Relationship?
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • 3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright
  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License