• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Columns, Daily Blog, Trademark

An IP Case that Apple DIDN’T Win: TTAB Refuses to Register Apple’s Icon

Submitted by Madison Mandell on October 1, 2012 – 1:06 AM6014No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F10%2F01%2Fan-ip-case-that-apple-didnt-win-ttab-refuses-to-register-apples-icon%2FAn+IP+Case+that+Apple+DIDN%E2%80%99T+Win%3A+TTAB+Refuses+to+Register+Apple%E2%80%99s+Icon2012-10-01+05%3A06%3A40Madison+Mandellhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D6014

Myspace has had a rough couple of years. While it enjoyed some time at the forefront of the web 2.0 wave circa 2003, Facebook became the largest social networking site in 2008 and Myspace’s popularity (and value) took a swift and dire hit. In short, Myspace could use a win.

The TTAB thought so too, apparently. On September 18th, the TTAB upheld the refusal to register Apple’s well-known music app icon for “computer software for use in reviewing, storing, organizing, and playing pre-recorded audio content, sold as a feature of handheld mobile digital electronic devices comprised of digital audio and video players, handheld computers, personal digital assistants, and electronic personal organizers, in International Class 9.” The mark was refused under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act of 1946 on the ground that it was likely to cause confusion with Myspace’s registered mark for “providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for adding music and video profiles on the internet, for listening to MP3’s and for shaping MP3’s and music playlists with others.”

According to gizmodo.com, Myspace’s music icon was originally trademarked by a music sharing and downloading service called iLike in 2008, which Myspace acquired in 2009. Both Apple’s and Myspace’s marks depict double music notes on an orange rectangular background.  This is where the visual similarities end, though.  The picture below shows Apple’s icon (left) and Myspace’s mark (right). In a side-by-side comparison, the two marks seem sufficiently different so as not to cause consumer confusion.

 

The Huffington Post highlights that in its argument to the TTAB, Apple claimed that no consumer has confused its mark with Myspace’s registered mark. The TTAB stated, “The test is not whether the marks can be distinguished when subjected to a side-by-side comparison, but rather whether the marks are sufficiently similar in terms of their overall commercial impression so that confusion as to the source of the goods and services offered under the respective marks is likely to result.” Under this test, the TTAB held that the icons are too similar in appearance and in the services, goods, and classes of consumers associated with each mark.

After Apple’s monster $1 billion patent victory against Samsung, Myspace winning a trademark case against the tech giant is a true Rudy moment. Perhaps this little victory marks a turn for Myspace. The website’s redesign previews are already garnering favorable reviews from a variety of tech websites.  While Myspace has been down for awhile now, this TTAB decision coupled with a major site redesign proves that they are far from out.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Madison Mandell

Madison Mandell is a 2L at the American University Washington College of Law. She graduated from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2010 with B.A.s in English and Journalism, and a minor in Creative Writing. Madison is a blogger for the AU Intellectual Property Brief and a staff member on the Administrative Law Review. She is interested in intellectual property law, art and media law, and administrative law.

Madison Mandell has written 8 posts for the IPB.

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Pinterest Squares Off Against Well-Known Cyber-Squatter Where Does Rioja Wine Really Come From? Can’t Read a Law Review Article?  Read a Comic Book Triple Town v. Yeti Town: Copyright Infringement in Videogames Hope, Bon-Mot, Copyrights, Money: a Chilean Experience Who Owns Students’ Class Notes?  California State University System Slaps NoteUtopia.com Entrepreneur with Cease and Desist Letter The Oregon Trail v. Frontierville: A Trademark Battle for our Childhood U.S. and Cuba Clash over Havana Club Trademark Fall 2010 Blogger Positions Available Invalidity or Infringement: the Battle over Antibody Patents Volume 3, Issue 2 of the Intellectual Property Brief is now available! UltraViolet: The
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License