• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Articles, Columns, Featured, Trademark

Victoria’s Secret Stores Sued of Selling Knockoff Hosiery Under False Packaging

Submitted by Daniel Jang on September 20, 2012 – 1:01 AM5954One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F09%2F20%2Fvictorias-secret-stores-sued-of-selling-knockoff-hosiery-under-false-packaging%2FVictoria%E2%80%99s+Secret+Stores+Sued+of+Selling+Knockoff+Hosiery+Under+False+Packaging2012-09-20+05%3A01%3A17Daniel+Janghttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5954

The average consumer does not put much thought into what suppliers are behind the products sold by their favorite brands. Yet most famous American consumer brands actually are supplied by other, lesser-known companies. Such was the arrangement between Columbus, Ohio-based lingerie chain Victoria’s secret and New Jersey-based hosiery supplier Zephyrs. Zephyrs signed a contract in 2001 that allowed the brand to supply its Italian-made hosiery to Victoria’s Secret stores.

Recently, Victoria’s Secret has switched to a cheaper Canadian supplier but continues to use packaging that depicts images of Zephyrs products. Zephyrs has filed suit in federal court in Columbus, Ohio alleging breach of contract and false advertising under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. According to Washington Speakers Bureau, Inc. v. Leading Authorities, Inc., 33 F.Supp.2d 488, 493 (E.D. Va. 1999), “to prevail under §43(a) of the Lanham Act, a plaintiff must show that it has ‘a valid, protectible trademark and that the defendant’s use of a colorable imitation of the trademark is likely to cause confusion among consumers.’”

In its complaint, Zephyrs contends the “by making unauthorized use, in interstate commerce, of photographs of Zephyrs’ products on packaging in connection with inauthentic, low quality knockoffs, the Defendants have falsely misrepresented the nature, characteristics and/or qualities of its goods.” Exhibits are included which show the visual differences in terms of cheaper lace trim, irregular borders, less durable construction and missing heel reinforcements between the Zephyrs products depicted on the packaging and the actual Canadian ones being sold.

Zephyrs is also seeking “corrective advertising and a recall of the accused products, which may have been sold in over a thousand Victoria’s Secret stores, and on one of the Internet’s most popular websites, VictoriasSecret.com.”

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Daniel Jang

Daniel is a 3L at the Washington College of Law with an interest in international law, immigration law, and intellectual property. He studied Political Science and History of Art at The Ohio State University and has also previously lived overseas in China and Hong Kong.

Daniel Jang has written 14 posts for the IPB.

5954One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F09%2F20%2Fvictorias-secret-stores-sued-of-selling-knockoff-hosiery-under-false-packaging%2FVictoria%E2%80%99s+Secret+Stores+Sued+of+Selling+Knockoff+Hosiery+Under+False+Packaging2012-09-20+05%3A01%3A17Daniel+Janghttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5954 »

  • Victoria’s Secret Stores Sued of Selling Knockoff Hosiery Under False Packaging – American University Intellectual Property Brief | Victoria Secret says:
    September 20, 2012 at 7:32 PM

    [...] American University Intellectual Property Brief [...]

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D printing is the hot new topic in the tech world and with it come some possible issues related to safeguarding intellectual property. This two part post evaluates the possible issues that may arise due to 3D printing and why there isn’t any cause for alarm, yet.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Trademark Infringement Suit against Latest Pop-Rap Craze Could Be a Sign of Things to Come Superman vs. Shop Owner Mother of Trayvon Martin Files Trademark Applications Update: Charlie Sheen Files Applications to Trademark Two More Catch Phrases Trade Secrets Bill Would Open Private Federal Litigation In re EMC – the Federal Circuit Limits Joinder for Pre-AIA Cases Father of DNA Weighs In On Patentability of Human Genes ECJ Issues Ruling in Google Adwords Case Amidst SOPA and DMCA, Comedian Louis C.K. Speaks to Artists’ Relationship with Pirates
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • 3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright
  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License