• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured

‘Bon Appetit’: Julia Child’s Intellectual Property Legacy

Submitted by Chelsea Zimmerman on September 9, 2012 – 12:38 PM5904One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F09%2F09%2Fbon-appetit-julia-childs-intellectual-property-legacy%2F%E2%80%98Bon+Appetit%E2%80%99%3A+Julia+Child%E2%80%99s+Intellectual+Property+Legacy2012-09-09+16%3A38%3A06Chelsea+Zimmermanhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5904

Last month, Julia Child, the celebrity chef who introduced boeuf bourguignon to many American kitchens, would have celebrated her hundredth birthday. The deceased celebrity’s iconic cuisine, mannerisms, and image continue to spawn numerous pop culture references including Saturday Night Live sketches, blogs, the film Julie & Julia based on a blog, and even a blog about watching the film based on a blog.

One of the endeavors of the Julia Child Foundation for Gastronomy and the Culinary Arts is the protection of the celebrity chef’s right of publicity against unlicensed use. Earlier this summer, BSH Home Appliances Corp., the manufacturer of Thermador ovens, released advertisements featuring the deceased celebrity chef’s name and image for commercial purposes, without obtaining permission from the Julia Child Foundation.

The Julia Child Foundation filed a complaint in a California district court for damages and injunctive relief based on trademark and trade dress infringement, as well as copyright infringement. The complaint alleges that there is strong commercial value associated with Julia Child’s name and image in the food and cooking industries. Additionally, the complaint cites to Julia Child’s practice of refusing commercial endorsements during her career as a celebrity chef and author. By continuing to limit exposure of Julia Child’s name and image, the Julia Child Foundation claims to be adhering to the practice generated by the original owner of these intellectual property rights regarding commercial use of her name and image.

Four days before the Julia Child Foundation filed their complaint in California, however, BSH filed a complaint for declaratory judgment in the district court of Massachusetts in response to a cease and desist letter received from the Julia Child Foundation. BSH argues that Julia Child’s use of Thermador appliances in both her personal kitchen and on her public television show is a known fact supported by the recent Smithsonian exhibit and, therefore, using a picture of her with a Thermador oven is not copyright, trademark, or trade dress infringement.

The current litigation developing over the use of Julia Child’s postmortem name and image addresses two important issues of intellectual property law. One concern is the use of protected intellectual property rights in a factual context for commercial activity. Should the Julia Child Foundation be able to restrict BSH from using the celebrity chef’s name and image to support a fact? Should BSH be able to use a celebrity’s protected name and image for commercial purposes?

This litigation also addresses a developing question in intellectual property law—how is a person’s postmortem right of publicity protected? The Massachusetts legislature is currently discussing Bill S.1713, which would allow the right of publicity to be considered a property right that is transferable to a celebrity’s heirs upon death.

As litigation continues, these two issues will receive particular attention regarding potential limits and expansions on the right of publicity.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Chelsea Zimmerman

Chelsea Zimmerman is a 2L at Washington College of Law. In addition to being a Blog Editor and Blogger for the IP Brief, Chelsea is involved with the Moot Court Honor Society and the AU Journal for Gender, Social Policy & the Law. Chelsea has a B.A. in Political Science from Heidelberg University and an M.A. in International Studies from the University of Denver. Chelsea is interested in IP law and international business law, particularly their intersection with human rights.

Chelsea Zimmerman has written 5 posts for the IPB.

5904One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F09%2F09%2Fbon-appetit-julia-childs-intellectual-property-legacy%2F%E2%80%98Bon+Appetit%E2%80%99%3A+Julia+Child%E2%80%99s+Intellectual+Property+Legacy2012-09-09+16%3A38%3A06Chelsea+Zimmermanhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5904 »

  • American University Intellectual Property Brief » 'Bon Appetit': Julia … - University Lebanon | University Lebanon says:
    September 10, 2012 at 6:09 PM

    [...] from: American University Intellectual Property Brief » 'Bon Appetit': Julia … Posts Related to American University Intellectual Property Brief » 'Bon Appetit': Julia [...]

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Great Scott!  Nike Releases ‘Back to the Future’ Shoes “Everything Comes from Nature Apple Wins Slide to Unlock Against Motorola Amazon Heads to the Cloud, But is it in Danger of Losing ‘Stream’? Naked Cowboy’s Trademark Suit Dismissed Superman vs. Shop Owner The Unimaginable Happened: Google Sued for Copyright Infringement Can ICANN?  Can’t Yet Tell Should Apartment Hunting Be Even Harder?: Craigslist Sues Padmapper and 3Taps for Aggregating its Listings Without Permission Copyright Office Seeking Comments On Bringing Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Under Federal Jurisdiction Best Buy vs. NewEgg: Who Owns “Geek”? Big-Four Tobacco Companies’ Fight Against Plain-Packaging Legislation Cupcake Wars Judge in Lawsuit Over Store Name
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License