• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured, Trademark

Ryan Lochte Applies for Federal Trademark, Hopes People Will Buy “Jeah!” Sunglasses

Submitted by Jess Robinson on August 21, 2012 – 9:58 AM58128 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F08%2F21%2Fryan-lochte-applies-for-federal-trademark-hopes-people-will-buy-jeah-sunglasses%2FRyan+Lochte+Applies+for+Federal+Trademark%2C+Hopes+People+Will+Buy+%22Jeah%21%22+Sunglasses2012-08-21+13%3A58%3A12Jess+Robinsonhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5812

As reported first by TMZ, Olympic swimmer Ryan Lochte filed an application on August 1st to federally register a trademark for his celebratory catchphrase “Jeah!”  At first glance, and maybe also after many more prolonged ones, filing a trademark for a nonsense word like “Jeah!” looks like a silly thing to do.  Part of the silliness of course is that the word doesn’t have any meaning, which Lochte himself hasn’t been able to help, and has even embraced.  All the same, Lochte hopes to use the brand to help capitalize on his post-Olympics fame and glory.  According to his trademark application, he plans to slap the word on merchandise such as t‑shirts, hats, water bottles, posters, key chains, swimming goggles, and workout DVDs.  He’s already done so for sunglasses, which you can purchase here if you so desire.

Lochte unsurprisingly doesn’t claim to have created the word entirely himself.  He credits American rapper Young Jeezy for having coined its prior version “Cheah!,” but I think it’s more likely that Lochte just heard Young Jeezy use it in many of his songs.  “Cheah!” simply being an emphatic pronunciation of “Yeah!,” I think it’s better to talk about common use than to argue about who originally came up with the word.  Lochte took a liking to it and decided it would be a good way to sell sunglasses and build a brand for himself, and while most of the world only wishes they could worry about such things, Compton rapper MC Eiht actually does.  He claims to have been using the word before Locthe, and he says he’s going to send him a cease and desist letter.  Important to note is that MC Eiht claims to have been using the term since before Lochte, but not to have registered the mark before Lochte.

You could say that trademark protection works on two levels.  A person can have an enforceable trademark by having federally registered it, or they can assert its enforceability through the common law.  By applying to federally register his trademark, Lochte would be able to enforce his mark throughout the country without having to delve into how different jurisdictions interpret their common law of trademark enforcement.  Federal registration makes sense for Lochte because he’s a national athlete, hoping to capitalize on his fame all around the country.  By making a claim of prior use and thinking Lochte should stop, it’s not clear whether he thinks Lochte should stop using the term altogether or whether he thinks Lochte should stop trying to monopolize its commercial use.  Either way, he opposes Lochte’s application to register it, so let’s look at that.

According to 15 U.S.C. § 1051, Lochte’s application needs some crucial things for it to be considered complete.  Namely, § 1051(a)(3)(D) says that Lochte must claim that “no other person has the right to use such mark in commerce either in the identical form thereof or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of such other person, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.”  Uh-oh.

By having admitted that he took the word from Young Jeezy’s songs, how could Lochte think that no one else has the right to commercially use the word, or any other confusingly similar word?  Lochte could think his changing the first sound so that “Cheah!” becomes “Jeah!” makes it sufficiently different, but . . . come on.  Alternatively, Lochte could think that his use of the term is different enough from Young Jeezy’s that they occupy different markets and people wouldn’t confuse them for each other.  That’s also a weak argument because all Lochte’s trying to do is sell basic merchandise like sunglasses and t‑shirts.  His line of work doesn’t align him with those products any more than Young Jeezy’s does.

Instead, it might be the goofy nature of Lochte’s mark that will keep him afloat.  The statutory language says that the applicant must claim “no other person has the right to use such mark in commerce. . . .”  It only makes sense to interpret this as meaning that no one else has the exclusive right to use this in commerce.  When the mark is just a variation of the quintessential exclamation “Yeah!,” of course people have the right to use the word when the speak, both within and outside of commercial uses.  So, does anyone else have an exclusive right to commercial use of the term?  Let’s narrow it further.  Trademark law generally requires trademark owners to use the mark or else they lose control over it.  Because of this, let’s phrase the question this way: is anyone else currently using the mark to build goodwill in their brand, the protection of which they can pursue through the common law?

MC Eiht apparently thinks he has control over the trademark, or at least thinks that Lochte doesn’t.  It’s one thing for MC Eiht to be upset that Lochte has commoditized such a commonly used term by applying to federally register it as a trademark, instead of letting it be something left for public use.  It’s another thing, however, to challenge the legitimacy of Lochte’s application by claiming that someone else has the right of exclusive use of the mark.  To show that, MC Eiht might have to argue that his use of “Jeah!,” “Cheah!,” or whatever other variation thereof is a deliberate one to build his own brand.  That won’t be so easy, and in this light, Lochte’s silly application to trademark his nonsensical catchphrase looks like it will go swimmingly.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Jess Robinson

Jess Robinson is a 3L at WCL with interests in IP and Environmental Law. He studied Linguistics and Japanese at the University of Texas and is currently fascinated with how IP protection provides both an incentive for creative thought and a hindrance for its dissemination.

Jess Robinson has written 35 posts for the IPB.

58128 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F08%2F21%2Fryan-lochte-applies-for-federal-trademark-hopes-people-will-buy-jeah-sunglasses%2FRyan+Lochte+Applies+for+Federal+Trademark%2C+Hopes+People+Will+Buy+%22Jeah%21%22+Sunglasses2012-08-21+13%3A58%3A12Jess+Robinsonhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5812 »

  • Smokey says:
    August 21, 2012 at 10:36 AM

    Lochte should be denied his application b/c he's a Dbag.

    Reply to this comment »
  • ‘Jeah!’ Ryan Lochte To Trademark Bizarre Catchphrase « Go to News! says:
    August 21, 2012 at 1:48 PM

    [...] Olympic swimmer and perennial headline-maker Ryan Lochte is attempting to trademark his catchphrase “Jeah.” [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • ‘Jeah!’ Ryan Lochte To Trademark Bizarre Catchphrase | Test says:
    August 21, 2012 at 1:50 PM

    [...] Olympic swimmer and perennial headline-maker Ryan Lochte is attempting to trademark his catchphrase “Jeah.” [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • ‘Jeah!’ Ryan Lochte To Trademark Bizarre Catchphrase « News Flash says:
    August 21, 2012 at 1:51 PM

    [...] Olympic swimmer and perennial headline-maker Ryan Lochte is attempting to trademark his catchphrase “Jeah.” [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • 2012 : une année de propriété intellectuelle en délire | Les moutons enragés says:
    January 1, 2013 at 4:09 AM

    [...] célèbre pour le gimmick qu’il prononce à tout bout de champ : « Jeah » ! Il a déposé ce simple mot, pour pouvoir vendre des objets portant cette marque. Au passage, rappelons qu’il [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • pr says:
    March 14, 2013 at 4:16 AM

    magnificent publish, very informative. I ponder why the opposite
    experts of this sector do not understand this.
    You must continue your writing. I’m sure, you’ve a great readers’ base already!

    Reply to this comment »
  • BUCK FUTTER says:
    April 17, 2013 at 1:35 AM

    GYEA! (TM)

    Reply to this comment »
  • Barney says:
    May 6, 2013 at 2:40 AM

    The link interface vehicle populates the com port and components velocity
    options. Dyno Sprint provides free of charge software package
    updates.

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D printing is the hot new topic in the tech world and with it come some possible issues related to safeguarding intellectual property. This two part post evaluates the possible issues that may arise due to 3D printing and why there isn’t any cause for alarm, yet.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Cupcake Wars Judge in Lawsuit Over Store Name $10 Million Kardashian Mishap J. Crew Sues Design Director over Trade Secrets INFLEXIBLE: COPYRIGHT OFFICE PUTS A HALT ON COPYRIGHTS FOR YOGA SEQUENCES Shrimp, Algae, and Medical Supplies:  After $29.4 Million Jury Award, HemCon To Ask For Reversal Las Vegas Casino Supplier Sues a Minnesota Casino and Hotel in Trademark Dispute Trademark Law: The New Weapon Against Gangs? Going “Up”? Utah Homebuilder Transports Residents to the Fantasy World of Disney’s “Up” iPhone 5 Available in China - You Can Eat It, But Apple Can’t Sell It. “Everything Comes from Nature Capturing Clouds: Intellectual Property Issues Within the Live Entertainment Production Process The Role of Patents in the International Framework of Clean Technology Transfer: A Discussion of Barriers and Solutions
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • 3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright
  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License