• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured, Patents

Pfizer Wins Lyrica Patent Infringement Case Against Teva and Other Generic Drug Manufacturers

Submitted by Amer Raja on July 23, 2012 – 7:41 PM5696No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F07%2F23%2Fpfizer-wins-lyrica-patent-infringement-case-against-teva-and-other-generic-drug-manufacturers%2FPfizer+Wins+Lyrica+Patent+Infringement+Case+Against+Teva+and+Other+Generic+Drug+Manufacturers2012-07-23+23%3A41%3A18Amer+Rajahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5696

Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware ruled last week that generic drug manufacturers, such as Teva Pharmaceuticals, had infringed on Pfizer’s Lyrica patents.  Lyrica, also known as Pregabalin (U.S. Pat. 6,197, 819), is used to treat chronic pain disorders like fibromyalgia and other neuropathic pain disorders.

Pfizer registered its patents with the USPTO, secured FDA approval in 2004, and sold its first batches of the drug in the fall of 2005.  Lyrica was also one of the drugs involved in the recent fraudulent marketing case brought against Pfizer, which resulted in Pfizer shelling out $2.3 billion to resolve civil and criminal healthcare liability issues ($48 million of the settlement can be specifically attributed to Lyrica).

Several generic drug manufacturers such as Teva, Mylan, and Watson Pharmaceuticals, challenged the validity of the Lyrica patents and applied for FDA approval for generic versions of the drug.   Pfizer subsequently filed a lawsuit in April 2009, seeking injunctive relief to prevent competitors from launching competing generic versions prior to the patent expiration date.

The patents at issue (U.S. Pat. 5,563,175; U.S. Pat. 6,001,876; U.S. Pat. 6,197, 819) cover various elements of the Lyrica drug and also have different patent expiration dates.  Two of these patents, the ones pertaining to Pregabalin and methods for using it to treat pain, will expire in December 2018.  On the other hand, the remaining patent, which covers the method for using Pregabalin to treat seizure disorders, will expire in October 2013.

However, because the court determined that the generic manufacturers must wait until the expiration of patents covering the drug, Pfizer will likely be able to continue its exclusive sale and manufacture of Lyrica until 2018 barring an appeal decision indicating otherwise.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Amer Raja

Amer Raja is a 2013 J.D. Candidate at the Washington College of Law. Amer is a Senior Blogger for the Intellectual Property Brief, Student Attorney for the Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual Property Law Clinic and the President of the Society for Dispute Resolution. Amer competed in the Saul Lefkowitz Trademark Moot Court competition in February 2012 and placed third in the East Regional Competition in New York City. He is also a competing member of the ICC International Commercial Mediation team, and will be going to Paris in February 2013 to compete. Amer is currently working for a boutique trademark litigation firm, Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff LLP, in Washington, D.C. He has also worked in the past for the Honorable Ricardo M. Urbina in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, American Bar Association, American Board of Pediatrics, and the NCCSAS. Amer has a passion and demonstrated interest in patent and trademark litigation, international trade law, and commercial litigation.

Amer Raja has written 17 posts for the IPB.

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

The IP Clinic Advocates for Consumers in Aereo and Aereokiller Proceedings George Clinton sues the Black Eyed Peas Rick Ross v. Rick Ross – Who ya got? The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent “Toto, I have a feeling we’re not in [public domain] anymore.” The Next SOPA/PIPA Battle: A Response to Five Arguments for Copyright Access and Internet Freedom Halal Meat Monitoring Company Accused of Bullying in UK The Effects of “Isolation”:  Will the Supreme Court be convinced that “isolated” genes are patent eligible?  The Russian IPR Problem: How Accession to the WTO is Not the Magical Solution, Rather a Step in the Right Direction Fair Use Connected to Economic Strength, Study Shows Groupon Sues Former Employees for Revealing its Trade Secrets to Google Trial Wraps Up in Gucci’s Trademark Infringement Suit Against Guess
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License