• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Trademark

That’s A Clown Question, Bro

Submitted by Daniel Jang on June 28, 2012 – 1:31 AM5589One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F06%2F28%2Fthats-a-clown-question-bro%2FThat%E2%80%99s+A+Clown+Question%2C+Bro2012-06-28+05%3A31%3A29Daniel+Janghttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5589

In this age of instant social-media fame, any fleeting catchphrase uttered by a celebrity has the potential to start a “meme” and launch a cottage industry of products. Parties who are quick to secure the associated intellectual property rights are rewarded in this environment. Washington Nationals teenage sensation Bryce Harper is only the latest celebrity to move quickly to protect his catchphrase’s instant Web fame.

During a routine post-game media session in Toronto, the Nevada native was asked if he would enjoy a celebratory beer in honor of his athletic performance and what his favorite brand of beer was. Although he is of legal drinking age in Canada, Harper is underage in the U.S. and also a devout Mormon. The absurdity of this question inspired him to quip: “That’s a clown question, bro.”

The baseball superstar’s representatives quickly moved to trademark the phrase on June 13th, and his athletic apparel sponsor Under Armour announced shortly afterwards that they would be producing an official line of shirts bearing the phrase. Already plastered on homemade T-shirts, stock tickers, and countless Internet tributes, this “meme” reached another level of immortality when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D.-NV) dropped the phrase in a press conference.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Daniel Jang

Daniel is a 3L at the Washington College of Law with an interest in international law, immigration law, and intellectual property. He studied Political Science and History of Art at The Ohio State University and has also previously lived overseas in China and Hong Kong.

Daniel Jang has written 14 posts for the IPB.

5589One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F06%2F28%2Fthats-a-clown-question-bro%2FThat%E2%80%99s+A+Clown+Question%2C+Bro2012-06-28+05%3A31%3A29Daniel+Janghttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5589 »

  • kristine says:
    July 1, 2012 at 2:09 AM

    wow awesome article!

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Nollywood or the Compelling Story of a No Copyright’s Land Does Google Lie About Android's “Openness?” Facebook & Timelines.com Prepare For Trial with Joint Status Report Velvet Underground Sues Andy Warhol Foundation YouTube Unveils Creative Commons Library Death Decrowned - Billboard Depicting Grim Reaper Wearing Cheesehead is Altered The Medicrime Convention and its Side Effects on Intellectual Property Infringements in the Field of Drug Counterfeiting Towards a Doctrine of Fair Use in Some of Patent Law Software Patents: The Case for Harmonization of European and American Law Through American Decisiveness and Leadership Where Ranting Against IP Rights Goes Wrong
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License