• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Copyright, Daily Blog, Featured

DVD Encryption Cracking Up For Debate

Submitted by Priya Mahajan on May 22, 2012 – 8:40 PM52914 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F05%2F22%2Fdvd-encryption-cracking-up-for-debate%2FDVD+Encryption+Cracking+Up+For+Debate2012-05-23+00%3A40%3A40Priya+Mahajanhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5291

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA) makes it illegal for the public to circumvent the encryption technologies in their digital purchases. Just a few days ago (May 17th), testimony was presented to federal regulators on the issue of whether the public, especially filmmakers and video mixers, should be allowed to lawfully crack DVD encryption to copy the material contained within and obtain high quality video clips.

The DMCA was signed into law by President Clinton in 1998, and the Act is largely responsibly for the success of companies such as Google and YouTube due to its strict notice and takedown system, which protects websites from liability for copyrighted material uploaded by its users as long as the operator of the site takes down the material when notified that it was uploaded without permission. The Act includes an anti-circumvention rule that prevents users from finding a way around the encryption provided for digital technologies, including DVDs. Even lawful owners of technology, including DVDs, are forbidden from copying the legally purchased material according to the anti-circumvention provision of the DCMA, which states, “No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.”

However, an exemption to the anti-circumvention rule also states that the aforementioned shall not apply to users of copyrighted works, “if such persons are…adversely affected by virtue of such prohibition in their ability to make noninfringing uses of that particular class of works….” This exemption places the burden on users who want to circumvent DVD encryption technology. They will have to show that they will be adversely affected by the anti-circumvention rule during the production of a noninfringing work.

The filmmaking industry is largely opposed to the pro-decryption views of the filmmakers. The industry representatives testified at the recent hearing, opposing a decryption exemption for filmmakers. They argued that filmmakers and video artists still have the option to license the bits of film from the respective film studios or to use screen capture technology on computers. Despite industry opposition, the filmmakers are pushing for an exemption to the DMCA due to the poor quality of the film obtained through these other methods.

In addition to filmmakers and the general public, video remix artists also testified at the public hearing, asking for a decryption exemption for video production reasons. Just as the filmmakers are asking for encryption cracking for increased film quality, video mixers are pursuing encryption cracking for the same increased picture quality in the bits of video being displayed. If federal regulators allow the exemption to the DMCA; filmmakers, video remix artists, and the public at large will be able to use decryption technology to copy the material contained within DVDs and obtain high quality video clips. These users will benefit by being able to use these high quality clips to make the best possible reproduction for filmmaking purposes. However, content owners, such as the filmmaking industry, are afraid that granting the exemptions will lead to the same kind of mass piracy that the recording industry is experiencing with unprotected music. Still, pirates are likely to continue to utilize decryption measures with or without the anti-circumvention exemption, so piracy of DVDs is unlikely to escalate if regulators approve the exemption request.

Since 2000, regulators have allowed four anti-circumvention exemption requests, making it a significant possibility that the exemption up for debate will be granted. All possible exemptions to the DMCA, if approved, will expire in three years and will have to be reauthorized by the U.S. Copyright Office. Federal regulators are expected to approve or deny the exemptions later this year.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Priya Mahajan

Priya Mahajan is a 2L interested in IP Law and Real Estate Law. She is currently interning with FEMA. Priya holds a BS in Logistics and Supply Chain Management with a Collateral in International Business from The University of Tennessee. She is originally from Cookeville, Tennessee and her interest in IP law stems from interests in technology and cyberlaw.

Priya Mahajan has written 11 posts for the IPB.

52914 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F05%2F22%2Fdvd-encryption-cracking-up-for-debate%2FDVD+Encryption+Cracking+Up+For+Debate2012-05-23+00%3A40%3A40Priya+Mahajanhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D5291 »

  • Barry Rudd says:
    October 4, 2012 at 9:18 AM

    CloneDVD is a proprietary DVD cloning software, developed by Elaborate Bytes, that can be used to make backup copies of any DVD movie not copy-protected (for this reason it is often used in conjunction with AnyDVD, a tool that includes disabling such protections).

    Reply to this comment »
  • We buy cars says:
    October 22, 2012 at 7:31 AM

    I agree with you. This post is truly inspiring. I like your post and everything you share with us is current and very informative, I want to bookmark the page so I can return here from you that you have done a fantastic job …

    Reply to this comment »
  • Use4Video says:
    January 12, 2013 at 1:58 AM

    I agree with you. This post is truly inspiring.

    Reply to this comment »
  • IQmango Soft says:
    January 29, 2013 at 11:49 AM

    I believe dvd ripping is fully legal when you make backups or convert dvd into files for personal use.

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Riding on the Coattails of Ralph Lauren’s Horseman Logo Gets Bumpy #SOPA Markup This Thursday: What You Can Do to Prevent #CensorshipEverywhere Lara Croft: Copyright Infringer? IBM Faces Antitrust Claim Before European Commission The Vegas Strip Steak: Butchering Meets Intellectual Property Viacom’s Appeal Not So Appealing After YouTube Filing Design Patents: Fashion’s Next Big Thing? Chile Becomes the Latest PCT International Searching and Preliminary Examining Authority “Hungry Hobbit” Restaurant Asked to Change Name Eat More: Chick-Fil-A versus Kale Jay-Z Sued for Big Rippin'
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License