• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Copyright, Daily Blog, Featured

France’s Hadopi Sends First Cases for Prosecution

Submitted by Alexandra Mackey on March 19, 2012 – 10:57 PM49583 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F03%2F19%2Ffrance%25e2%2580%2599s-hadopi-sends-first-cases-for-prosecution%2FFrance%E2%80%99s+Hadopi+Sends+First+Cases+for+Prosecution2012-03-20+02%3A57%3A45Alexandra+Mackeyhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D4958

Hadopi, France’s agency responsible for protecting intellectual property rights on the Internet, has sent its first load of cases of Internet users who allegedly downloaded films and music illegally for prosecution.

Globally, the music industry has been advocating for stricter laws regarding illegal downloading of music on the Internet.  In response to the international concern over rampant copyright infringement via the Internet, France proposed more rigorous legislation to protect against and to punish these infringers.  After a number of drafts, the legislation backed by France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy implements a “three strikes” law.  Under the law, infringers are sent a warning e-mail, then a letter via registered mail, and then if the problem still persists their Internet connection is cut off for a period of time. The legislation was passed into law in May 2009. The three strikes law is known as Haute Autorité pour la Diffusion des Œuvres et la Protection des Droits sur Internet, though it is commonly referred to by the acronym Hadopi.  Hadopi is the also the name of the state agency that enforces the law.

The agency, just shy of three years old now, has sent warning emails to over 800,000 users and over 68,000 letters to users for their second strike.  Hadopi has placed 165 infringers under investigation in the third phase. In this last phase, courts are allowed to impose fines of €1,500, which is about $2,000. 

Supporters of Hadopi say that the system is working, as evidenced by the low number of third-stage offenders.  Supporters also point to a study by Wellesley College and Carnegie Mellon University that indicated that Internet users’ awareness of Hadopi led to about a 25% increase in sales of iTunes songs and albums among those aware of and likely to be affected by Hadopi, in comparison to other groups.  The study suggests that users who were aware of the consequences of illegal downloading purchased more music via legal downloads such as the Apple iTunes Music Store.

Critics of the Hadopi law claim that the law directly violates freedom of expression.  They are outraged that third-stage infringers would have their Internet cut off, and argue that that punishment is disproportionate to the crime of copyright infringement.  Critics further suggest that the statistics have been manipulated to signify that the Hadopi law is stopping users from illegally downloading music and films.

Recently, Hadopi sent its first third strike cases to the French prosecution office. The list of alleged infringers was sent to the public prosecutors office, where the prosecutors will decide whether they will bring legal action against the users.

In another chapter in the fight against illegally downloading music, the French government has employed a harsh consequence against repeat offenders.  Only time will tell if this system will actually stop copyright infringement from illegal downloading, but France will be keeping a close eye on this first round of cases.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Alexandra Mackey

Alexandra Mackey is a 3L at WCL with an interest in Intellectual Property and Corporate Law. She is a Senior Blogger for the IP Brief and Managing Editor of the Business Law Review. Alexandra graduated from Pepperdine University with a B.A. in Integrated Marketing Communications. Prior to WCL, Alexandra lived in New York where she worked in the fashion industry.

Alexandra Mackey has written 20 posts for the IPB.

49583 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F03%2F19%2Ffrance%25e2%2580%2599s-hadopi-sends-first-cases-for-prosecution%2FFrance%E2%80%99s+Hadopi+Sends+First+Cases+for+Prosecution2012-03-20+02%3A57%3A45Alexandra+Mackeyhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D4958 »

  • French Tony says:
    March 24, 2012 at 1:35 AM

    An important benchmark in French history. it will be interesting to see how the French live with this infringement of their absolute "liberté"…

    Reply to this comment »
  • Ireland's Largest ISP Wants Country-Wide Three-Strikes Piracy Response — paidContent says:
    July 2, 2012 at 8:22 PM

    [...] In France, where a 2009 law introduced a provision to issue three warning letters before a court referral, the Hadopi agency charged with overseeing the scheme had by December sent 822,014 first-strike warnings, 68,343 second-strike warnings and has placed 165 alleged infringers under investigation for the third strike (via IP Brief). [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • Ed in Toronto says:
    August 7, 2012 at 10:21 AM

    Stunned to learn that the French are actually enforcing their own laws! We shall see what happens under le nouveau régime…

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Return of the Hacker Ethic Sen. Feinstein’s Amendment Set Aside 87-13; One Step Closer to Patent Reform Getting a Trademark Holder’s Goat Google Publishes DMCA Takedown Request Data for Search Results A Serious Problem: Posner on the State of Patent Law Zediva Makes Hollywood's Business Model Totter Just a Little More Tim Tebow’s Monopoly on Prayer: Confusion Surrounding “Tebowing” and the Reach of Trademark Protection A Federal Court Keeps CafePress on the Hook for Trademark Infringement, Rejecting Motion to Dismiss Intellectual Property Rights in South Sudan Life Imitates Art – Samsung Using 2001 in Patent Litigation
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
  • Oh, That’s Different … Never mind: USPTO Withdraws Ruling that IPAD MINI is “Merely Descriptive”

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License