• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Copyright, Daily Blog, Featured

Ferris Bueller’s Pay Day

Submitted by Kate Collins on February 25, 2012 – 1:16 PM4856One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F02%2F25%2Fferris-bueller%25e2%2580%2599s-pay-day%2FFerris+Bueller%E2%80%99s+Pay+Day2012-02-25+18%3A16%3A50Kate+Collinshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D4856

Image Attributed to Flickr User Andre Natta.

In a world where it is getting harder to get an audience for commercials, Madison Avenue needs a hook. When that hook is a famous copyright and the audience is the Super Bowl’s it is best to play it safe and get a license, even if it comes at a cost.

The Super Bowl, in addition to being an excuse to take a few hours off from studying and off of a New Year’s diet, is also an event that is replete with significance for intellectual property, (although this may be more evident to those of us with a flagging interest in professional football.) The NFL is famous for going after trademark infringers; the athletes and their trainers are searching for innovations that will give even the slightest edge using materials and devices both under and out of patent protection; and the telecast itself, not to mention the half-time show, is all protected by copyright. This is all before we even consider the fact that it is the largest television event of the year, and unlike many it is all but immune to being DVR’d to speed through later, making its significance for marketing grow in the last few years.

One of the most anticipated commercials of this Super Bowl was a Honda commercial featuring Mathew Broderick reprising his Ferris Bueller character.  The rise of individuals recording shows to watch later and watching television online has made commercial advertising more difficult. For these reasons, advertising companies try to hype their commercials to get voluntary viewership online or on the recorded DVR version, all while maintaining focus on their primary goal of selling goods and services.

One way to pique interest in commercials is by using characters that the audience can connect to, in some cases this is a task of branding like in M&M’s trademarked candy pieces, but sometimes a company draws on other characters. This year Honda used the plot line of Ferris Bueller to sell their CR-V’s. This is not the first time they have used a famous movie character to sell their cars. In the 1990s, Honda got in trouble for using a character stylized after James Bond to sell its Civic del Sol convertible. MGM sued Honda in the Central District of California for misappropriating its character and was able to receive damages and enjoin Honda’s further use.

Honda did not make that mistake this year. Ferris Bueller is owned by Paramount Pictures, a subsidiary of media conglomerate Viacom, which is in a continuing legal battle with YouTube over copyright infringement. Honda licensed the Ferris Bueller character from Paramount pictures, and neither side is disclosing what Honda paid for it. If I were Paramount, I would have asked for a hefty sum, because as advertisers feel continued pressure to pull audiences to them, copyright owner’s iconic characters become increasingly valuable.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Kate Collins

Kate Collins is a second year at Washington College of Law. She graduated from the University of California, Berkeley in 2010. She spent the summer working for the Superior Court in her home town in California and currently works for the Alliance of Artists and Recording Companies. She is especially interested in Trademark and Copyright law.

Kate Collins has written 7 posts for the IPB.

4856One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2012%2F02%2F25%2Fferris-bueller%25e2%2580%2599s-pay-day%2FFerris+Bueller%E2%80%99s+Pay+Day2012-02-25+18%3A16%3A50Kate+Collinshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D4856 »

  • A-wu says:
    February 29, 2012 at 8:40 PM

    Kudos to the Creative Director behind the Ferris Bueller ad for the Superbowl. Jay Sperling is a talented man, having designed the Mac vs. PC ads as well.

    Read about him over at http://www.academyart.edu/news/articles/the-man-b… on the AAU website.

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D printing is the hot new topic in the tech world and with it come some possible issues related to safeguarding intellectual property. This two part post evaluates the possible issues that may arise due to 3D printing and why there isn’t any cause for alarm, yet.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Zediva Makes Hollywood's Business Model Totter Just a Little More Ice, Ice, Maybe– Check Out the Hook and Hope Bowie Absolves It Summer 2010 - Vol. 2, Issue 1 is Now Available! Ethical Issues in IP Litigation Chew on This:  Federal Circuit Loosens Requirements for Showing of Anticipation in Chewing Gum Case Black Macaques and a Camera Cause a Copyright Uproar Kobe Beef: Are you getting what you pay for? Beatles Wheelchair Trademark Blocked Las Vegas Casino Supplier Sues a Minnesota Casino and Hotel in Trademark Dispute Wii Would Like to Play: Nintendo Defends Wii Technology on First-to-Market and First-to-File Grounds YouTube’s New and Improved Content ID System Cell Signaling Technology Grants Patent License to Pfizer Volume 3, Issue 3 of the American University Intellectual Property Brief Now Available!
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • 3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright
  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License