• Home
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
  • Symposium
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Video

Blog posts featuring video clips.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured, Trademark

Kellogg Reaches Settlement in ‘Toucan’ Trademark Dispute – Few Feathers Ruffled

Submitted by Richard Patterson on November 17, 2011 – 7:38 PM4433One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F11%2F17%2Fkellogg-reaches-settlement-in-toucan-trademark-dispute-%25e2%2580%2593-few-feathers-ruffled%2FKellogg+Reaches+Settlement+in+%27Toucan%27+Trademark+Dispute+%E2%80%93+Few+Feathers+Ruffled2011-11-18+00%3A38%3A59Richard+Pattersonhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D4433

Earlier this year in September, fellow IP Blogger Seth Dennis commented on a lawsuit the Kellogg’s cereal company had threatened against the Maya Archaeology Initiative (“MAI”) for trademark infringement.  The threatening mark was a picture that included a side-view of a toucan placed in front of a Mayan temple.  Kellogg felt, at the time, that this mark was too closely related to their “famous” Toucan Sam, which adorns the front of Fruit Loops boxes worldwide.  In a letter dated July 19, Kellogg’s corporate counsel expressed the concern of “both consumer confusion and a dilution of (Kellogg’s) strong equity in these marks.  Kellogg is also concerned by the inclusion of the Mayan imagery in the mark, given that our character is frequently depicted in that setting.”

Kellogg seemed to not give a hoot when self-policing its “Toucan” trademark. If Kellogg had, the company likely chosen not to enforce its rights against MAI.  MAI is a project of the California-based World Free Press Institute (“WFPI”), a non-profit that defends free expression and challenges repression of cultural heritage issues.  If attacking a non-profit over the use of a not-really-similar mark is not enough – Kellogg argued that Toucan Sam is often seen in a Mayan environment.  This “environment” turned out to be an online video game in a Mayan setting where the only character of color was an evil witch doctor who steals.

Realizing that the two marks were not likely to be confused and that any confusion would be caused by a culturally insensitive depiction of the Mayans, MAI and the WFPI launched a public relations attack on Kellogg.  Backed with an extensive knowledge of the media and reporting, (WFPI’s co-founder Clay Haswell worked for the Associated Press for 18 years before helping to start the non-profit) MAI began to send out charged statements like this one: “Kellogg’s products are a staple of many Guatemalan households. We expect a brand that is so familiar to children to play a role in supporting cultural and racial understanding around the world, rather than undercutting it by promoting demeaning racial stereotypes.” It was not long after the initial cease and desist letter from Kellogg that the large cereal corporation began to receive a great deal of press. To their credit, Kellogg immediately took down the offending online game and began settlement discussions with MAI once they realized their mistake.

Usually settlement agreements aim to reach a middle ground, but because of the lack of judgment Kellogg showed in self-policing (or bullying) its trademark, MAI has come out of this as the clear winner.  According to the Battle Creek Enquirer, discussions between Kellogg and MAI led Kellogg to be satisfied that their trademark is not in danger.  In the same report, MAI spokesperson Sam Haswell stated that in an act of good corporate citizenship, “Kellogg made it clear that they wanted to be part of the solution rather than part of the problem. When they understood some of the issues facing Mayan culture, they decided to come to the table and be part of the solution.” What exactly does coming to the table mean?  In this case, it means donating a lot of money.

In a joint statement released November 15, Kellogg has agreed to make a $100,000 contribution “to help launch one of the MAI’s priority projects to improve the lives of the Maya people in a region rich in cultural heritage but lacking in access to education and economic opportunities.”  The project referred to is a Mayan cultural center that will feature classrooms and storage areas to protect Mayan antiquities. Along with the generous donation, Kellogg will also feature “major Mayan accomplishments and a link to the MAI website on Kellogg’s Fruit Loops cereal boxes next year.”

My colleague Mr. Dennis was on point in analyzing that the move to threaten legal action may do more “damage to the brand’s goodwill than any (and extremely unlikely) confusion that may arise.”  Luckily for Kellogg, they realized their mistake early and have done their best to work with MAI and restore the corporation’s public image before it ran a-fowl.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Richard Patterson

Richard Patterson is a 2L at WCL with an interest in copyright and trademark law. Richard graduated from Boston College in 2009 with majors in Philosophy and History. In his free time, he enjoys playing golf and continuously being let down by BC athletics.

Richard Patterson has written 8 posts for the IPB.

4433One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F11%2F17%2Fkellogg-reaches-settlement-in-toucan-trademark-dispute-%25e2%2580%2593-few-feathers-ruffled%2FKellogg+Reaches+Settlement+in+%27Toucan%27+Trademark+Dispute+%E2%80%93+Few+Feathers+Ruffled2011-11-18+00%3A38%3A59Richard+Pattersonhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D4433 »

  • griffinbarnett says:
    November 18, 2011 at 10:31 AM

    The cereal is called "Froot Loops" not "Fruit Loops"; otherwise, nice update on the status of this dispute.

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Piracy, Pornography and Conspiracy: How Judges Are Standing Up to Copyright Trolls

Piracy, Pornography and Conspiracy:  How Judges Are Standing Up to Copyright Trolls

In an attempt to secure large settlements from as many parties as possible, the adult entertainment industry has been joining individuals from the same district who illegally downloaded the same film in a single claim as co-conspirators. This enables them to discover Doe-defendants’ identities and get them to settle rather than be a party in a pornography suit. It worked for a while, but there is a problem, the defendants aren’t co-conspirators.

More articles »

Patents »

The Federal Circuit Defers to the Lower Court, Invalidates Social Networking Patent

The Federal Circuit Defers to the Lower Court, Invalidates Social Networking Patent

Yesterday, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a jury verdict invalidating Leader Technologies, Inc.’s patent on an online networking system. A reversal may have put Facebook in jeopardy.

More articles »

Trademark »

Fake Coachella Merchandise Banned at the Festival

Fake Coachella Merchandise Banned at the Festival

This year’s Coachella music festival has its share of intellectual property issues. Attorneys for the festival have recently cracked down on counterfeit goods and asked a federal court judge to issue a preliminary injunction against certain vendors.

More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Reclaiming our Technological Posterity at the Intersection of Intellectual Property and Taxation: Uncovering how Patent Pools are Key to Recovering the Benefits of Charitable IP Contributions Aiming for a Bite Out of Apple Facebook’s Timeline Legal Fight with Timelines, Inc. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Declares: Scientists Are Bad at Explaining Themselves Microsoft Claims Victory Against Motorola Mobility’s German Lawsuit by Using a Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order Issued by a U.S. Judge in a Contract Dispute A Tale of Cities Keep Off Kardashians! The Gap Fights Back, Retaliates to Kim K’s Suit Over Alleged Misappropriation of Her Celebrity Persona Spring 2010: Vol. 1, Issue 1 now available in PDF Non-profit Turf Wars: The Challenges When Every Group Is Nollywood or the Compelling Story of a No Copyright’s Land Traditional Knowledge Protection for African Cultures Kodak: An Example of What Not to do With Your Patents. Google to Restrict “Jailbroken” Android Phones From Accessing New YouTube Features
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • The Federal Circuit Defers to the Lower Court, Invalidates Social Networking Patent
  • Piracy, Pornography and Conspiracy: How Judges Are Standing Up to Copyright Trolls
  • DVD Pirate Supports Troops, America, Freedom
  • Fake Coachella Merchandise Banned at the Festival
  • Video(game) Killed the Radio Star: EMI Sues Def Jam Over Video Game’s Unlicensed Use of Rap Songs

Twitter

  • The Federal Circuit Defers to the Lower Court, Invalidates Social Networking Patent - http://t.co/QW9iUbfT by Jonathan Stroud
  • Piracy, Pornography and Conspiracy: How Judges Are Standing Up to Copyright Trolls - http://t.co/xnT2pBGn by Kate Collins
  • DVD Pirate Supports Troops, America, Freedom - http://t.co/6kcnsWFW by Carrie Sager
  • Fake Coachella Merchandise Banned at the Festival - http://t.co/flRRpGJe by Alexandra Mackey
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License