• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog

US Chamber of Commerce’s “The Innovation Lifecycle” and the New Economy

Submitted by JJ Gottschalk on September 25, 2011 – 10:59 AM40392 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F09%2F25%2Fus-chamber-of-commerce%25e2%2580%2599s-%25e2%2580%259cthe-innovation-lifecycle%25e2%2580%259d-and-the-new-economy%2FUS+Chamber+of+Commerce%E2%80%99s+%E2%80%9CThe+Innovation+Lifecycle%E2%80%9D+and+the+New+Economy2011-09-25+14%3A59%3A50JJ+Gottschalkhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D4039

The United States Chamber of Commerce recently launched an interactive online presentation called “The Innovation Lifecycle” which is supposed to help educate Americans and policymakers about the importance of IP protection. The video goes through the stages of the product lifecyle: Idea, R&D, Production, Distribution, and Benefits. While I agree that strong IP laws do promote sound trade and create jobs in America, the video seems to neglect the fact that innovation also sometimes comes from using other people’s ideas and making new products for consumers to enjoy.

Take for example the recent rise in “mashup music.” While certain forms of it have been around in clubs and other venues, the ease with which a person can take multiple sources of music and create a whole new song has developed into its own genre. The Global IP Center would be quick to say that this is profiting off of the work of the source artist’s material, however, if innovation is the goal the Global IP Center is trying to promote, then certainly someone creating a new form of music for listeners to enjoy should be championed as well. Creating new markets is a vital part of the US economy and will allow our country to stay competitive. Cavalierly dismissing innovation that comes in the form of modifying existing products fails to capture areas where new products can be developed.

I have written on this blog before about how artists should be allowed to exercise their rights, and I am cognizant that some may not like what is done to their creations by mashup artists or open source computer programmers and modifiers. However, to completely ignore that innovation doesn’t just come out of thin air, but can come through collaboration and trying to blend different concepts together just seems to sugar coat the issue. America’s best exports in the coming years will come from the IP fields and what should be promoted, on top of our existing IP laws and trade agreements, is an attempt to have the online communities that rework existing innovative programs and products with the produces themselves to create new products for the world to enjoy. I applaud the Global IP Center for attempting to create a video that will appeal to people who are not familiar with IP, but I am worried that too often, some of the real innovators in our society are being neglected, for fear of being seen as condoning illegal behavior.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: JJ Gottschalk

JJ Gottschalk is a 3L at the Washington College of Law. JJ is a graduate of The George Washington University where he majored in International Business. During his undergraduate studies, JJ interned at the Department of Commerce in the Office of the International Intellectual Property Coordinator. JJ's IP interests include IP finance and IP protection in trade agreements.

JJ Gottschalk has written 23 posts for the IPB.

40392 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F09%2F25%2Fus-chamber-of-commerce%25e2%2580%2599s-%25e2%2580%259cthe-innovation-lifecycle%25e2%2580%259d-and-the-new-economy%2FUS+Chamber+of+Commerce%E2%80%99s+%E2%80%9CThe+Innovation+Lifecycle%E2%80%9D+and+the+New+Economy2011-09-25+14%3A59%3A50JJ+Gottschalkhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D4039 »

  • Fernando Torres MSc (@FTorresMSc) (@FTorresMSc) (@FTorresMSc) says:
    September 25, 2011 at 11:45 AM

    US Chamber of Commerce’s “The Innovation Lifecycle” and the New Economy: The US Chamber of Commerce re… http://t.co/RcOUPAcO #IP

    Reply to this comment »
  • PRG (@PRGPatentLaw) (@PRGPatentLaw) says:
    September 26, 2011 at 3:00 PM

    A critique from the @IPBrief blog on a promotional video from the US Chamber of Commerce defending #IP rights. http://ow.ly/6EPj1

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D printing is the hot new topic in the tech world and with it come some possible issues related to safeguarding intellectual property. This two part post evaluates the possible issues that may arise due to 3D printing and why there isn’t any cause for alarm, yet.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Obama Creates IP Enforcement Advisory Committees Publisher Forced to Give Up Plan to Publish Excerpts from Mein Kampf Facebook Added A New Event To Its Timeline: The Timeline Trademark Trial White House to DMCA: People Should Be Able to Unlock Their Phones The Washington Declaration on Intellectual Property and the Public Interest Who Controls Trademarks In Films? Short Circuit: January 1 - 29, 2013 Royal Wedding Highlights Differences Between US Fair Use and UK Fair Dealing Instyler vs. Amazon: How Much Should a Service Provider Police its Users Activities? Michael Jordan Sues Qiaodan Sports to Reclaim His Name First Denmark Copyright Case Involving Sampling Decided
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • 3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright
  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License