• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Featured, Trademark

Virginia Tech Settles Trademark Dispute with Hokie Real Estate Company

Submitted by Richard Patterson on September 16, 2011 – 12:00 PM39768 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F09%2F16%2Fvirginia-tech-settles-trademark-dispute-with-hokie-real-estate-company%2FVirginia+Tech+Settles+Trademark+Dispute+with+Hokie+Real+Estate+Company2011-09-16+16%3A00%3A38Richard+Pattersonhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3976

Image Attributed to Flickr User Techsports

Earlier this year I reported on the decision of the District Court in Western Virginia to deny Virginia Tech’s (“VTech’s”) motion for preliminary injunction in a case against John Wilburn (“Wilburn”) and his company Hokie Real Estate.  The lawsuit began in October of 2010, with VTech alleging trademark infringement against Hokie Real Estate for diluting the Hokie moniker.  Wilburn, a VTech alum, fought the claim and this summer a settlement was reached between the two parties.  The Roanoke Times recently obtained the settlement and licensing agreement through a Freedom of Information Act request.  So what did Wilburn get for standing up to his alma mater?  As it turns out, a lot.

According to the story printed by the Roanoke Times, Wilburn now has a licensing agreement to use the Hokie mark without payment along with free ad space for Hokie Real Estate in Virginia Tech’s alumni magazine.  As if this weren’t enough – Wilburn will also receive four tickets to every home football game for the next five years, as well as ten years of platinum-level Hokie Club membership (an estimated $50,000 – $100,000 value alone).  In return for their generous offer, Wilburn has agreed to stipulate that Virginia Tech owns the exclusive right to the “Hokie” trademark.  In addition, Wilburn must let the mark that he has registered for “Hokie Real Estate” expire in 2016 without renewal. 

On its face, the settlement favors Wilburn – but in reality, it is beneficial to both parties.  With the lawsuit over, Virginia Tech has avoided further litigation.  Up until the settlement, Virginia Tech’s attorney fees were in excess of $125,000, according to university spokesman Larry Hincker.  Virginia Tech also avoided a potential courtroom loss to Wilburn.  VTech, from all outside appearances, looked as though it was going to lose the lawsuit.  I argued in my previous post that Wilburn had strong points against the false designation of origin and dilution claims.  Had VTech continued the suit, they could have been liable for both parties’ attorneys’ fees.  Along with the money that they would have had to pay out, Virginia Tech would have also lost control of the Hokie trademark in the real estate market.  Virginia Tech, however,has retained its trademark.  With the lawsuit gone and recognition of Virginia Tech as the sole possessor of the “Hokie” name, VTech bolstered its ownership of the mark and made it more difficult for potential infringers to make an IP claim against the university.

Settling this lawsuit was a great strategic move by Virginia Tech – they retain the power of their trademark and John Wilburn gets to hear “Enter Sandman” a lot more than he would have otherwise.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Richard Patterson

Richard Patterson is a 2L at WCL with an interest in copyright and trademark law. Richard graduated from Boston College in 2009 with majors in Philosophy and History. In his free time, he enjoys playing golf and continuously being let down by BC athletics.

Richard Patterson has written 8 posts for the IPB.

39768 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F09%2F16%2Fvirginia-tech-settles-trademark-dispute-with-hokie-real-estate-company%2FVirginia+Tech+Settles+Trademark+Dispute+with+Hokie+Real+Estate+Company2011-09-16+16%3A00%3A38Richard+Pattersonhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3976 »

  • Mauricio Gordon (@MauriciGordonP) says:
    September 16, 2011 at 12:39 PM

    http://t.co/hTygPbde American University Intellectual Property Brief » Virginia Tech …

    Reply to this comment »
  • Strategic Name Dev. (@namedevelopment) says:
    September 16, 2011 at 1:34 PM

    Virginia Tech Settles Trademark Dispute with Hokie Real Estate Company http://t.co/CrppGSWk via @AddToAny

    Reply to this comment »
  • David_Lilenfeld (@David_Lilenfeld) says:
    September 16, 2011 at 3:15 PM

    Va. Tech settles trademark suit against “Hokie Real Estate.” Agreement forced public via Freedom of Information Act: http://t.co/b6JF18nm

    Reply to this comment »
  • Gary says:
    September 16, 2011 at 7:31 PM

    The photo you used to accompany this article belongs to me. While I don't mind you using it, I would appreciate a link back to the flickr account from which you pulled it. Also, it is considered common courtesy to request permission to use someone else's work.

    Reply to this comment »
    • IPBrief says:
      October 21, 2011 at 9:58 AM

      Gary,
      I noticed this comment and wanted to weigh in. We used your photo because it is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-ND 2.0). We really appreciate you licensing your photos in this way as the IPB, along with many artists, academics, and students, use Creative Commons-licensed work to enhance our articles without first requesting permission to use the work. In turn, we license our blog posts in the same way, so others can use them without fear of infringing on our copyright.
      Originally, we had attributed your image to the name of your Flickr account, as your real name was not available. Since reading your comment we’ve added a link to your Flickr account, making it easier to find your pictures.
      The IPBrief takes copyright law VERY seriously…it\’s kind of our thing. If you have any questions about the IPB\’s photo-usage or licensing procedures, please contact us at ipbrief (at) wcl.american.edu.

      Eric Perrott
      Editor-in-Chief

      Reply to this comment »
  • @Christ_james75 says:
    October 14, 2011 at 3:38 AM

    @Gary: Hahaha now worries friend as long as this article is marvelous and useful. Trademark attorney is your good adviser… lolz

    Reply to this comment »
  • Mark@Honduras Real Estate says:
    December 4, 2011 at 5:16 PM

    Hi there, this weekend is nice for me, since this occasion i am reading this great educational piece of writing here at my home.

    Reply to this comment »
  • Mark@Honduras Real Estate says:
    December 4, 2011 at 5:36 PM

    Hello, its good paragraph regarding media print, we all be aware of media is a wonderful source of information.

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

GoPro in Hot Water: Extreme Camera Company Accused of Using DMCA to Stifle User Review Galliano wins in Cybersquatting Case A Question of Moral Rights in the United States Holy Anti-Counterfeiting Batman! ACTA Text Might be Completed! Copyright in the Classroom: Why Comprehensive Copyright Education is Necessary in United States K-12 Education Curriculum Louis Vuitton Alleges Trademark Dilution Cord-Cutting Culprit?  Fox Television and Major Broadcasters Claim Aereo Broadcast Streaming Service Infringes Programming Copyrights Nobody Walks All Over Tory Burch: Shoe Designer Sues over Monogram Logo Major Media Companies File Amicus Brief in Support of Google Update: Charlie Sheen Files Applications to Trademark Two More Catch Phrases PIJIP: The Intersection of Intellectual Property, Trade, and Development Harjo v. Pro-Football: Human Rights Implications of a Trademark Lawsuit
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License