• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Archive by Month

Article Archive for August 2011

Final Announcement: Fall 2011 Submissions Due Today
August 31, 2011 – 10:22 AM | 38862 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F08%2F31%2Ffinal-announcement-fall-2011-submissions-due-today%2FFinal+Announcement%3A+Fall+2011+Submissions+Due+Today2011-08-31+14%3A22%3A44Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3886
Final Announcement: Fall 2011 Submissions Due Today

Please submit completed IP-related papers and a cover page with your name and the title of the article by 5pm EST on August 31st, 2011 to ipbrief@wcl.american.edu.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Yellow, Pink, Blue: Are They All “Equal”?
August 28, 2011 – 1:14 PM | 38703 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F08%2F28%2Fyellow-pink-blue-are-they-all-equal%2FYellow%2C+Pink%2C+Blue%3A+Are+They+All+%22Equal%22%3F2011-08-28+17%3A14%3A29Griffin+Barnetthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3870
Yellow, Pink, Blue: Are They All “Equal”?

The colors used in sugar-substitute packaging may serve as the basis for a trade dress infringement claim.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
New Music Service Spotify Gets Hit with Patent Infringement Claim
August 25, 2011 – 8:28 AM | 386210 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F08%2F25%2Fnew-music-service-spotify-gets-hit-with-patent-infringement-claim%2FNew+Music+Service+Spotify+Gets+Hit+with+Patent+Infringement+Claim+2011-08-25+12%3A28%3A31Alexandra+Mackeyhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3862
New Music Service Spotify Gets Hit with Patent Infringement Claim

California- based software company PacketVideo sues the newest music streaming service, Spotify, for patent infringement. Tech blogs are claiming that this is another example of an infringement case based largely on an overly broad patent.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Volume 3, Issue 1 of the Intellectual Property Brief is now available!
August 25, 2011 – 8:00 AM | 38535 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F08%2F25%2Fvol-3-issue-1-of-the-intellectual-property-brief-is-now-available%2FVolume+3%2C+Issue+1+of+the+Intellectual+Property+Brief+is+now+available%212011-08-25+12%3A00%3A45IP+Brief+Staffhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3853
Volume 3, Issue 1 of the Intellectual Property Brief is now available!

The American University Intellectual Property Brief is pleased to announce the publication of its Summer 2011 issue.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Markman Pro Publico: Friending the Courts on Patent Claim Interpretation Issues
August 25, 2011 – 8:00 AM | 38502 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F08%2F25%2Fmarkman-pro-publico%2FMarkman+Pro+Publico%3A+Friending+the+Courts+on+Patent+Claim+Interpretation+Issues2011-08-25+12%3A00%3A37Charles+Lee+Thomasonhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3850
Markman Pro Publico: Friending the Courts on Patent Claim Interpretation Issues

This article argues that amici could protect the public domain and enforce the public notice function of patent claims. Also, having the litigants restrict the range of interpretations a court may consider leaves the public interest aspects out of the decision-making process. This article contrasts the litigation-driven interpretations and the objective rules of construction and examines whether an amicus group representing the public interest might be excluded from claim interpretation proceedings.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
The Role of Patents in the International Framework of Clean Technology Transfer: A Discussion of Barriers and Solutions
August 25, 2011 – 8:00 AM | 3829One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F08%2F25%2Frole-of-patents%2FThe+Role+of+Patents+in+the+International+Framework+of+Clean+Technology+Transfer%3A+A+Discussion+of+Barriers+and+Solutions2011-08-25+12%3A00%3A08MarkConsilviohttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3829
The Role of Patents in the International Framework of Clean Technology Transfer: A Discussion of Barriers and Solutions

Alarming average temperature increases of the Earth’s surface and oceans have prompted global action to curtail the human population’s impact on climate change. First, this article addresses the current intergovernmental legal framework relating to climate change and the international transfer of climate change mitigation and adaptation technologies. This article also addresses some of the perceived barriers and possible solutions and an optimal solution based on the current international framework and evidence of technology transfer barriers.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Guest Post: A Myriad of Reasons: The Federal Circuit Soundly Rejects the Government’s “Magic Microscope” Test and Upholds Patentability for Isolated Human Gene Patents
August 24, 2011 – 4:30 PM | 38263 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F08%2F24%2Fguest-post-a-myriad-of-reasons-the-federal-circuit-soundly-rejects-the-government%25e2%2580%2599s-%25e2%2580%259cmagic-microscope%25e2%2580%259d-test-and-upholds-patentability-for-isolated-human-gene-patents%2FGuest+Post%3A+A+Myriad+of+Reasons%3A++The+Federal+Circuit+Soundly+Rejects+the+Government%E2%80%99s+%E2%80%9CMagic+Microscope%E2%80%9D+Test+and+Upholds+Patentability+for+Isolated+Human+Gene+Patents2011-08-24+20%3A30%3A13Jonathan+Stroudhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3826
Guest Post: A Myriad of Reasons:  The Federal Circuit Soundly Rejects the Government’s “Magic Microscope” Test and Upholds Patentability for Isolated Human Gene Patents

The Federal Circuit’s 2-1 Myriad decision upholding the patentability of isolated human genes represents sound judgment and takes into account the well-settled expectations of the parties affected by the ruling.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Trademark Infringement Settlement by…Quake 3 Tournament?
August 22, 2011 – 6:00 AM | 38198 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F08%2F22%2Ftrademark-infringement-settlement-by%25e2%2580%25a6quake-3-tournament%2FTrademark+Infringement+Settlement+by%E2%80%A6Quake+3+Tournament%3F2011-08-22+10%3A00%3A33Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3819
Trademark Infringement Settlement by…Quake 3 Tournament?

In response to a trademark infringement lawsuit, the makers of Minecraft offer to settle— with a Quake 3 tournament where the winner takes all. While vastly entertaining, the unique settlement offer highlights the ability to creatively negotiate terms that could benefit both sides of the dispute.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Digestion and Re-innovation: A Lesson Learned from China´s High-Speed Rail Technology-Transfer Agreements
August 7, 2011 – 9:40 AM | 380310 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F08%2F07%2Fdigestion-and-re-innovation-a-lesson-learned-from-china%25c2%25b4s-high-speed-rail-technology-transfer-agreements%2FDigestion+and+Re-innovation%3A+A+Lesson+Learned+from+China%C2%B4s+High-Speed+Rail+Technology-Transfer+Agreements2011-08-07+13%3A40%3A13Joe+Massiehttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3803
Digestion and Re-innovation: A Lesson Learned from China´s High-Speed Rail Technology-Transfer Agreements

Based on the recent experiences of European and Japanese companies in the high-speed rail industry, those who wish to protect patents and avoid creating competitors may want to steer clear of technology-transfer agreements with Chinese enterprises.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
Even Weird Al Gets Permission
August 4, 2011 – 8:55 AM | 378714 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F08%2F04%2Feven-weird-al-gets-permission%2FEven+Weird+Al+Gets+Permission2011-08-04+12%3A55%3A29Ali+Sternburghttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3787
Even Weird Al Gets Permission

If even Weird Al, whose works are clearly parodies and thus should clearly be fair use, cannot rely solely on fair use, then perhaps there are problems with our fair use doctrine, and there needs to be more education and awareness of the rights granted to the American public.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
  • Oh, That’s Different … Never mind: USPTO Withdraws Ruling that IPAD MINI is “Merely Descriptive”

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License