• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Copyright, Daily Blog, Featured

J.K. Rowling’s “Pottermore”: A Digital Rights Game-Changer?

Submitted by Griffin Barnett on June 26, 2011 – 12:11 PM36684 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F06%2F26%2Fj-k-rowlings-pottermore-a-digital-rights-game-changer%2FJ.K.+Rowling%27s+%22Pottermore%22%3A+A+Digital+Rights+Game-Changer%3F2011-06-26+16%3A11%3A26Griffin+Barnetthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3668

Book stores and online retailers can only watch from the sidelines as “Harry Potter” author J.K. Rowling prepares to launch “Pottermore,” an online Harry Potter universe that the site describes as “an exciting online experience around the reading of the Harry Potter books.” According to Rowling and media sources, the site will include chat forums, previously unreleased content and information about the world of Harry Potter and, most importantly, serve as the exclusive source of Harry Potter audio books and e-books.

Because Rowling first negotiated her publishing deal in the early 1990s–well before the appearance of digital books–her publishing company, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc., only acquired the print rights to the Harry Potter books; Rowling maintained all the digital rights to the works. Thanks to her complete and independent ownership of the digital rights, Rowling is able to control the creation and distribution of any digital Harry Potter material—and it will pay off big for the author. Rather than having to share revenues from sales of the audio books and e-books with the publisher or for an online retailer to distribute the electronic works, Rowling stands to reap 100% of profits (although the author voluntarily agreed to share a certain percent of the profits with Bloomsbury). Since e-books and other forms of digital publishing have emerged, publishing companies almost always acquire the digital rights in addition to the print rights when signing new authors.

Online e-book retailers like Amazon and Apple are certainly furious that they will be missing out on a slice of the Harry Potter e-book pie and brick-and-mortar stores like Barnes and Noble will take yet another hit to sales of paper copies of the books. However, spokesmen for Amazon and Barnes and Noble have stated that they will work with Pottermore to ensure the e-books will be available on the Kindle and Nook respectively.

Many (including myself) wonder if the Pottermore approach will catch on with more authors going forward. Many big-name authors could choose to let their publishing deals lapse and self-publish electronic copies of their works through their own websites. New authors could forego publishing companies altogether and use their own websites to self-publish and distribute their works. It will be interesting to see what the response is within the community of best-selling authors and publishers going forward and how the landscape of digital rights ownership and the distribution of written works will continue to change.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Griffin Barnett

Griffin Barnett is a 3L at the American University Washington College of Law and the 2012-2013 Editor-in-Chief of the AU Intellectual Property Brief, with interests in intellectual property law, international trade law, art & media law, internet law, and constitutional law. Griffin has previously served the Brief as a blogger and blog editor. He is also a senior staff member of the American University International Law Review and a Dean's Fellow for the Legal Rhetoric Program. Griffin holds a B.A. in International Studies with a minor in Business (Entrepreneurship & Management) from Johns Hopkins University. In his spare time, Griffin enjoys playing guitar, cooking, and sports of all kinds. He is from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Griffin Barnett has written 12 posts for the IPB.

36684 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F06%2F26%2Fj-k-rowlings-pottermore-a-digital-rights-game-changer%2FJ.K.+Rowling%27s+%22Pottermore%22%3A+A+Digital+Rights+Game-Changer%3F2011-06-26+16%3A11%3A26Griffin+Barnetthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3668 »

  • David Zimmer says:
    June 26, 2011 at 1:54 PM

    It will be an interesting play for JK as distribution of new materials are best handled through the big chains. However with her franchise she may be big enough with momentum to launch into a mega company the likes of Disney. Only time will define this moment in history. I definately applaud her business savy in her retention of electronic media rightts. Similar to George Lucas' retention of merchandising rights for the Star Wars franchise.

    Reply to this comment »
  • Harry Potter…Coming (Finally) to an E-Reader Near You! | JETLAW: Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law says:
    June 30, 2011 at 6:03 AM

    [...] choosing to digitally self-publish in this way, many wonder if J.K. Rowling’s approach will catch on with other authors. Depending on the success of Pottermore, authors may begin to look seriously at self-publishing [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • DBW Weekly Roundup: The Pottermore Special Edition | Digital Book World says:
    June 30, 2011 at 4:41 PM

    [...] does this mean that Pottermore is a “Digital Rights Game-Changer“? More broadly, will Pottermore “revolutionize publishing” (in this way or this [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • On Bloomsbury and buggy whips | Interactive Investor Blog says:
    October 19, 2011 at 10:14 AM

    [...] years, they’re worth nothing (JK Rowling retains the digital rights to Harry Potter so they’re not worth anything to Bloomsbury). The knowledgeable well connected staff. They’re worth nothing. Wisden, A&C Black, etc.. [...]

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D printing is the hot new topic in the tech world and with it come some possible issues related to safeguarding intellectual property. This two part post evaluates the possible issues that may arise due to 3D printing and why there isn’t any cause for alarm, yet.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

I Can Has Copyright Law: Ben Huh of the Cheezburger Network Talks About the Internet and Copyright The Quest For Inner Peace Gets A Little More Complicated. Can Anyone Own Yoga? No Patent for Simple Math: Uniloc USA Loses to Rackspace in Suit Pitting Patent Troll Against Open Source Software Company Short Circuit: January 1 - 29, 2013 Lamborghini vs. Dal Toro: A Battle of the Bull Tupac Hologram Rocks Coachella and IP Laws Discerning Plagiarism & Infringement: Practical Advice US Chamber of Commerce’s “The Innovation Lifecycle” and the New Economy Appeals Court Set to Hear University of Alabama Trademark Suit Against Local Artist Reconciling Copyright Laws With “Truth, Justice, and the American Way” California Computer Wars: Trademark Infringement Between Facebook and Google+
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • 3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright
  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License