• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Copyright, Daily Blog, Featured

Copyrights and Extradition

Submitted by Alison Keeley on June 22, 2011 – 12:18 PM36633 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F06%2F22%2Fcopyrights-and-extradition%2FCopyrights+and+Extradition2011-06-22+16%3A18%3A58Alison+Keeleyhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3663

Beware, foreign copyright-infringers.  Last week the United States announced that it was attempting to extradite 23-year-old U.K. citizen Richard O’Dwyer. O’Dwyer was the administrator of TVShack.net and TVShack.cc websites which provided links to pirated television shows and movies.  These sites were seized by U.S. Immigration and Customs enforcement last year, and now the U.S. is seeking to bring O’Dwyer to the U.S. to face charges.

This is not the first time, nor will it likely be the last, that the U.S. has sought extradition of someone over copyright infringement.  Australian Hew Griffiths, the head of a software piracy ring, was extradited to the U.S. in 2007 and received a 51 month jail sentence (though he was given credit for time served in Australia while fighting extradition).

However, Griffiths participated in a very different kind of internet piracy than O’Dwyer did.  While Griffiths was behind an operation cracking protection codes on software, music and movies; O’Dwyer’s site simply linked to pirated material.  In fact, U.K. solicitor David Cook argued that it would be difficult to convict O’Dwyer under European law.  Although the details are not clear, it appears O’Dwyer’s site did not host or transmit any of the pirated content, but merely linked to it.

This reaches a question in the internet-piracy battle.  Should the United States go after the O’Dwyer-s of the world?  Yes, O’Dwyer did facilitate illegal-movie watching and is part of a larger problem of internet piracy.  But, if he did not post or host any of the copyrighted material himself, is the U.S. overreaching in attempting to have O’Dwyer extradited?  Perhaps the fact that O’Dwyer was persistent in violating copyright laws – he continued reposting the site after it was taken down multiple times – should be taken into account.

Cases such as O’Dwyer’s lead to the recurring problem of the internet and jurisdiction.  How do you determine who, where, and what to charge?  If the person is in one country, the material is from another, and the servers are in a third, what is the most appropriate venue?  If you repeatedly help others find pirated material, are you at fault?  It seems like what prosecutors are trying to change is the image of internet piracy; saying that it’s not okay to participate in copyright infringement on any level.

This problem may in fact solve itself.  While the U.S. Government cuts heads off the Hydra, some CEOs are trying to turn a profit from pirated technology, or take over the internet market themselves. For now, a combination of innovation and prosecution are the best tools of those fighting internet piracy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Alison Keeley

Alison is a 3L at Washington College of Law and a Senior Blogger and Bluebooker for the IP Brief. She graduated from Northwestern University with a BA in Chemistry. She is also a member of the American University Law Review and the General Practice Clinic and is interested in Patent Law, Health Law, and Environmental Law. Alison is originally from Orlando, FL.

Alison Keeley has written 21 posts for the IPB.

36633 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F06%2F22%2Fcopyrights-and-extradition%2FCopyrights+and+Extradition2011-06-22+16%3A18%3A58Alison+Keeleyhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3663 »

  • أمريكا تطالب بريطانيا بتسليم أحد مواطنيها إليها بتهمة استغلال الإنترنت للقرصنة says:
    June 24, 2011 at 11:29 AM

    [...] للمزيد:  http://www.ipbrief.net/2011/06/22/copyrights-and-extradition [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • Big Content’s latest antipiracy weapon: extradition | lemonadeday.net says:
    July 22, 2011 at 6:42 AM

    [...] extradition. the other example is Australian resident Hew Griffiths, who was sent to the United States on warez charges in 2007 [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • Julia O'Dwyer says:
    August 1, 2011 at 10:55 AM

    Just to correct one inaccuracy here, he put the site up once more after his first domain was seized, not multiple times

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Piracy Crackdown Targets Over One-Third of Beijing Internet Cafes Brazil's Attempts to Regulate ISP Liability The Medicrime Convention and its Side Effects on Intellectual Property Infringements in the Field of Drug Counterfeiting Fall 2010 Blogger Positions Available Charges Dropped in Historic Trial of Game Console Modder NinjaVideo Not Stealthy Enough: Two Founders Plead Guilty to Conspiracy and Criminal Copyright Charges Publisher Forced to Give Up Plan to Publish Excerpts from Mein Kampf New gTLDs, New Problems Forever 21 vs. WTForever 21: Clothing Store Threatens Blog with Lawsuit, Claiming Trademark Infringement and Dilution Sounds Familiar: The Black Keys File Lawsuit Over Sound-a-likes Used in Ads The Patent Abuse of Patent Infringement Claims
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
  • Oh, That’s Different … Never mind: USPTO Withdraws Ruling that IPAD MINI is “Merely Descriptive”

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License