• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured, Trademark

The Oregon Trail v. Frontierville: A Trademark Battle for our Childhood

Submitted by Eric Perrott on May 24, 2011 – 9:19 AM35172 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F05%2F24%2Fthe-oregon-trail-v-frontierville-a-trademark-battle-for-our-childhood%2FThe+Oregon+Trail+v.+Frontierville%3A+A+Trademark+Battle+for+our+Childhood2011-05-24+13%3A19%3A33Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3517

Eric has dysentery. Words of my childhood brought to you by hours and hours of mastering the game Oregon Trail on my school’s Apple 2E. Now the text-based, black and green plains have been replaced with the digital landscape of mobile phones and the Internet. The Learning Company, owners of the Oregon Trail franchise, want to keep the Trail to themselves and are suing Zynga, the makers of Farmville, Cityville, and Frontierville, over the “Oregon Trail” expansion pack to the Facebook-based game Frontierville.

Zynga released a trailer of the Frontierville expansion that highlighted the similarities between the two games. In the expansion, a Frontierville user can ford rivers, set up wagons, and hunt oxen on the Trail. The expansion is set to be released May 30th, but The Learning Company is seeking an injunction to stop the release.

The complaint, found here, alleges trademark infringement for using “the Oregon Trail” mark to create confusion for the consumers, making consumers think that The Learning Company sanctioned this application. The trailer seems to support this idea. Within the first ten seconds, Zynga welcomes us to “set off on the Oregon Trail.” There are several factors involved in deciding whether a likelihood of confusion exists, but because of the similarity in markets and almost identical usage of the mark, Zynga will need to push the fact that they are using the mark descriptively to describe the features of the expansion (i.e. “it is very Oregon-Trail like”) but this defense may be difficult, especially with allegations of bad faith. Allegedly, TLC was in talks with Zynga about creating a Facebook version of the game last year. Talks fell apart and TLC ended up releasing the Oregon Trail with another company, attracting over one million users since February. Three months later, it seems as if Zynga is trying to use the Oregon Trail name to attract users to its Frontierville game.

As a side note, several news sources have been alluding to a copyright violation, which is not at issue with this case. However, this confusion is a perfect example of a concept called “the idea/expression dichotomy.” You can copyright the expression of an idea, like the graphics and text from the game itself, including character development and plot lines. However, preventing another from using the idea of “user takes a team out on a trail, overcoming obstacles, and reaching an end point” cannot be enforced under copyright law.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Eric Perrott

Eric is a Washington College of Law alumnus and was the 2011-2012 Editor-in-Chief of the IPBrief. Eric enjoys writing and playing music with his band, movies, and eating.

Eric Perrott has written 44 posts for the IPB.

35172 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F05%2F24%2Fthe-oregon-trail-v-frontierville-a-trademark-battle-for-our-childhood%2FThe+Oregon+Trail+v.+Frontierville%3A+A+Trademark+Battle+for+our+Childhood2011-05-24+13%3A19%3A33Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3517 »

  • himinimalz says:
    November 29, 1999 at 7:00 PM

    Hi all!

    Minimal, tech house, techno, electronic music, freshest updates, music reviews, dj promo tracks, all about minimal and techno world

    Disco, Nu-Disco, Disco, Nu-Disco music, Disco, Nu-Disco music daily updates

    Disco, Nu-Disco music, Disco, Nu-Disco music daily updates

    minimal, minimal music, house, house music, techno , techno music, tech house music, tech house, deep house, deep house music, chillout. techno, techno music, techno music daily updates.

    house, house music, house music daily updates.

    minimal, minimal music, minimal music daily updates.

    Disco, Nu-Disco, Disco, Nu-Disco music, Disco, Nu-Disco music daily updates

    Reply to this comment »
  • Frontierville Blog on: The Oregon Trail v. Frontierville: A Trademark Battle for our Childhood – American University Intellectual Property Brief | MiloRiano: Facebook games, news, tips & guides says:
    May 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM

    [...] Continued here: Frontierville Blog on: The Oregon Trail v. Frontierville: A Trademark Battle for our Childhood – Ame… [...]

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Eat More: Chick-Fil-A versus Kale Summer 2010 - Vol. 2, Issue 1 is Now Available! Isis Pharmaceuticals Files Lawsuit Against Santaris Team of 11-13 Year Old Girl Scouts Win Prize and File Provision Patent Application, Highlight the Importance of Inspiring Innovative Women Digestion and Re-innovation: A Lesson Learned from China´s High-Speed Rail Technology-Transfer Agreements American Inventors Beware: You Might End Up Just Like The French Shhh! Trade Secret Protection Has Expanded A Question of Moral Rights in the United States
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License