• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Copyright, Daily Blog, Featured, Video

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Submitted by Eric Perrott on May 14, 2011 – 8:37 AM34635 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F05%2F14%2Frelatively-new-anti-piracy-psa-another-analogy-comparison-of-piracy-to-stealing-cars-or-an-effective-message%2FRelatively+New+Anti-Piracy+PSA%3A+Another+Analogy+Comparison+of+Piracy+to+Stealing+Cars+or+an+Effective+Message%3F2011-05-14+12%3A37%3A23Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3463

You wouldn’t steal a car. Then why would you steal a movie? We all remember that famous PSA that ran on TV and before movies in the theater. Is the above PSA, sponsored by ICE, round 2? Or does it relay a different message? The IPBrief welcomes your comments!

According to a recent discussion at the Intellectual Property Breakfast in Washington, DC, Operation In Our Sites is now either adding links to the above PSA or in some cases actually embedding it into the seizure notice on seized domain names.

What are your thoughts? Does this new PSA, which makes a teenager decide between a free movie and a woman losing her job effective? Is the humor apparent enough to make the point? We would love to hear your thoughts.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Eric Perrott

Eric is a Washington College of Law alumnus and was the 2011-2012 Editor-in-Chief of the IPBrief. Eric enjoys writing and playing music with his band, movies, and eating.

Eric Perrott has written 44 posts for the IPB.

34635 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F05%2F14%2Frelatively-new-anti-piracy-psa-another-analogy-comparison-of-piracy-to-stealing-cars-or-an-effective-message%2FRelatively+New+Anti-Piracy+PSA%3A+Another+Analogy+Comparison+of+Piracy+to+Stealing+Cars+or+an+Effective+Message%3F2011-05-14+12%3A37%3A23Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3463 »

  • Chad Guo says:
    May 18, 2011 at 8:46 PM

    I have a hard time buying the argument that pirated movies will cost anyone a job. Bootleg movies are common in a lot of places like China, Hong Kong, Nigeria, and India, but movies still get made there. Of course, their budgets aren't nearly as big, so maybe the PSA just means that movie makers won't have as much money to use and consequently won't be able to hire as many people. But couldn't movie producers just pay the high-end employees (i.e. actors) less or use less well-known actors and use the money saved there to pay for all the crew they need? I could be wrong here, but I think the PSA is trying to find a more sympathetic face for the movie industry with the lowly sound technician instead of millionaire executives or actors.

    PSA's like this are about as effective as those against underage drinking. Even if made aware of the illegality and possible harm of breaking the law, people will still do what they want if: the enforcement of the law is lax enough, the prohibited behavior intuitively feels right to them, or the logic of the law doesn't make sense to them.

    And I'll finish with a link to another anti-piracy PSA that I've found in my travels. Enjoy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2HsyD4FJHQ

    Reply to this comment »
  • Chris says:
    June 13, 2011 at 8:55 PM

    Piracy is a balancing force is media today making the producing entities make their content good enough to buy for those who have the means and knowledge to pirate the content. Another good way to look at it is it's not actually illegal to download movies music and games in Canada simply for the reason that the person downloading them is not profitting from the download in any way the domains that get shut down are those charging for hosting services of the content with peer to peer downloads this almost entirely removes this problem. The sites specifically state cleary they do not condone the unauthorized access or download of copyrighted materials and is up to the user to download the files only if they already own the content and need a digital back up essentially removing all legal responsibility for content.

    Reply to this comment »
  • Chris says:
    June 13, 2011 at 8:55 PM

    Pirating is only illegal if you sell to your friends and or bootleg copies to sell here in Canada and thats the way it should be everywhere else. These people arent losing their jobs because you wont buy their content because they cannot hire people without already having the money and knowledge that they will make money off the production. To suggest pirating hurts the job infrastructure of media is to suggest no quality control. If I download a terrible copy of a movie to see if I like it 1/2 the time I will purchase a copy rather than wasting 5-10 dollars to rent a movie thats terrible i put my money in the pockets of content that deserves it.

    Reply to this comment »
  • Pharmb257 says:
    October 30, 2012 at 8:05 PM

    Hello! ekdekfc interesting ekdekfc site! I’m really like it! Very, very ekdekfc good!

    Reply to this comment »
  • cherrin12 says:
    March 2, 2013 at 1:35 AM

    Get added protection along with some extra on-the-go juice with these top-rated iphone 4 battery case for your iPhone.

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

6 Ways to Get Your Domain Name Seized by ICE* Can ICANN?  Can’t Yet Tell Facebook Sued for Patent Infringement over “Like” Button and Timeline Function Volume 3, Issue 2 of the Intellectual Property Brief is now available! Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan Virginia Tech Settles Trademark Dispute with Hokie Real Estate Company Snooky-1, Snooki- 0 Mutt’s v. Rutt’s: Dueling Hotdog Trademarks Michael Jordan Sues Qiaodan Sports to Reclaim His Name Best Buy vs. NewEgg: Who Owns “Geek”? Facebook Added A New Event To Its Timeline: The Timeline Trademark Trial Great Scott!  Nike Releases ‘Back to the Future’ Shoes
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
  • Oh, That’s Different … Never mind: USPTO Withdraws Ruling that IPAD MINI is “Merely Descriptive”

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License