• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured, Trademark

Amazon Responds To Apple’s Trademark Suit

Submitted by Jack Korba on April 29, 2011 – 8:00 AM3345No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F04%2F29%2Famazon-responds-to-apple%25e2%2580%2599s-trademark-suit%2FAmazon+Responds+To+Apple%E2%80%99s+Trademark+Suit2011-04-29+12%3A00%3A54Jack+Korbahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D3345

In response to a trademark lawsuit brought by Apple against Amazon for the company’s use of the term “App store,” Amazon claims that the term cannot be trademarked because it is too generic.  Amazon filed its response this week in the United States District Court in the Northern District of California, and contended that it did not need to gain authorization from Apple to use the terms to describe its own digital storefront. Amazon claims that Apple itself has made the term “App store” generic, and points to statements from Apple CEO Steve Jobs, who has called the digital Apple store “the easiest-to-use, largest app store in the world preloaded on every iPhone.”  Amazon also cited the American Dialect Society, which recently voted “app” as the Word of the Year for 2010, even though the word “has been around for ages.”

Apple’s App Store launched in 2008, and allows users of iPhones, iPods, iPads, and now even Intel-based Apple computers to download programs from Apple and third-party developers.  Apple applied to register the App Store trademark in the U.S. and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office approved the application.  However, Amazon insists in its response that it does not need a license from Apple to use the name Amazon App Store. Apple has not yet commented on Amazon’s rebuttal.

While Apple does enter this lawsuit with an approved trademark application from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Amazon has a strong defense.  The word “app” has been used long before the year 2008 to describe programs or applications.  By putting the name “Amazon” before its App Store, the company has further reduced the likelihood for confusion or dilution of the market.  Apple has made the terms particularly famous with the popularity of the company’s iPhone and iPad, but Steve Jobs himself has described Apple’s App Store as one of many of its kind.  It will be interesting to see whether the Court is willing to stretch the boundaries of trademark law this far, or whether it will dismiss the lawsuit outright.

For more on this story see “Amazon.com Seeks Dismissal of Apple Lawsuit over ‘App Store’” by Karen Gullo at http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-04-26/amazon-com-seeks-dismissal-of-apple-lawsuit-over-app-store-.html

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Jack Korba

Jack Korba is a third year law student at WCL with interests in IP Law, Criminal Law, and Litigation. Jack is currently the Executive Competition Director of the Mock Trial Honor Society, and a Blogger on the Intellectual Property Brief. He also works as a Dean's Fellow for Professor Matt Williams, who teaches International and Comparative Copyright Law, and is a Practitioner-in-Residence in the Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual Property Clinic. Jack holds a dual B.A. in Criminology & Criminal Justice and Government & Politics from the University of Maryland. He is originally from Califon, New Jersey.

Jack Korba has written 25 posts for the IPB.

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million YouTube’s New and Improved Content ID System A Limit to Markup: The FDA Refuses to Enforce Its Exclusivity Policy Chinese Trademark Office Refuses Registration for “FRACOGNAC” Mark Jimmy Wales Petitions to Stop Extradition of U.K. Student Google Doodles Up a Patent for a “System and Method for Enticing Users to a Website” 2011 ABA-IPL Spring Conference: A Student Report on Hot Topics in IP The Copyright Laws They Are A-Changing: Sony Issues Bob Dylan CDs to Extend Copyright Protection Fictional Trademarks That Aren’t Fiction Yellow, Pink, Blue: Are They All Ethical Issues in IP Litigation Kellogg Reaches Settlement in 'Toucan' Trademark Dispute – Few Feathers Ruffled A Threat to Breast Cancer Awareness
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
  • Oh, That’s Different … Never mind: USPTO Withdraws Ruling that IPAD MINI is “Merely Descriptive”

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License