• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured, Patents

WIPO Agrees to Support South American IP Project

Submitted by Joe Massie on March 28, 2011 – 8:00 AM2883No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F03%2F28%2Fwipo-agrees-to-support-south-american-ip-project%2FWIPO+Agrees+to+Support+South+American+IP+Project2011-03-28+13%3A00%3A36Joe+Massiehttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D2883

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) agreed earlier this month to support a pilot project by nine South American countries to integrate their intellectual property programs.  The initiative, which goes by the name PROSUR (System for Regional Cooperation in Intellectual Property), formed in January with the objective of “developing a common platform that will enable integration, the exchange of information, and the compatibility of participating office’s computer systems.”

WIPO will support the nine PROSUR members- Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, and Uruguay- by developing the necessary infrastructure (including the use of a new technology platform called WIPO-CASE), training patent examiners, and strengthening inter-state cooperation efforts.

WIPO-CASE, the Centralized Access to Search and Examination system, has been developed by WIPO to provide a shared electronic library of search and examination reports that all participating offices can access.  This pilot system was used for the first time last week, when it was launched by the IP offices of Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom.   By enabling offices to share the results of examinations, the system should reduce the time wasted, expense, and patent backlog caused by processing duplicate application files in multiple offices.  It remains unclear how soon PROSUR’s offices will begin using the platform.

According to internet sources, PROSUR’s regional collaboration project initiative will begin with a cooperative test, wherein 300 biomedical or mechanical patent solicitations will be shared with two or more member countries.  Patent examiners will then share their search and examination results with their counterparts in other IP offices.  For the time being through, each country’s IP office will remain autonomous, deciding on its own whether to grant the patent.

Although the prospect of a streamlined patent process spanning South America seems exciting, the concept also elicits some questions.  For example, is there any possibility that the initiative will lead to a decreased ability on the part of IP offices to make independent decisions?  As much as regional cooperation is a lauded goal, any impingement on an individual office’s autonomy could have worrisome consequences.  However, it will be interesting, in the meantime, to see if the upcoming cooperative test is successful and whether other South American nations will want to join PROSUR.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Joe Massie

Joe Massie is a 1L at WCL with an interest in Anti-Corruption Compliance, Intellectual Property, and Energy Law. Joe is originally from Potomac, Maryland, and graduated from the College of William and Mary with a B.A. in International Development.

Joe Massie has written 9 posts for the IPB.

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D printing is the hot new topic in the tech world and with it come some possible issues related to safeguarding intellectual property. This two part post evaluates the possible issues that may arise due to 3D printing and why there isn’t any cause for alarm, yet.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Las Vegas Casino Supplier Sues a Minnesota Casino and Hotel in Trademark Dispute Academic Publishers Beware Jersey Shore’s “The Situation” Files Suit Against Abercrombie & Fitch Best Buy vs. NewEgg: Who Owns “Geek”? DC Comics Sues Gotham Garage Over Replica Batmobiles Click on, Amazon: Online Retailer Wins 1-Click Infringement Appeal Copyrights and the Fashion Industry: A Love-Hate Relationship? Woman claiming royalties after ruining “Ecce Homo” Welcome to La Salada: Why Argentina is on the 301 Priority Watch List INFLEXIBLE: COPYRIGHT OFFICE PUTS A HALT ON COPYRIGHTS FOR YOGA SEQUENCES Gene Simmons Battles Anonymous Anti-Copyright Group
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • 3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright
  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License