• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Copyright, Daily Blog, Featured

UltraViolet: The “iTunes” of Movies?

Submitted by Yeve Chitiga on February 26, 2011 – 11:00 AM2465One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F02%2F26%2Fultraviolet-the-itunes-of-movies%2FUltraViolet%3A+The+%22iTunes%22+of+Movies%3F2011-02-26+16%3A00%3A43Yeve+Chitigahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D2465

"The UltraViolet Experience" slide in a presentationUltraViolet is the proposed new system that will enable consumers to purchase and maintain a library of their favorite movies and TV shows, without any limitation on the type of devices that have viewing capabilities. The new system ultimately provides a convenient way for consumers to “own” the movies they buy indefinitely. Understandably, the system has faced criticism, with many arguing that it is actually a restriction on access to digital technology and media, since it prohibits use to non-paying consumers. It has been labeled a “form of DRM (digital rights management) in disguise.” In fact, Apple and Walt Disney are yet to join the bandwagon and have not endorsed the system. Despite this, all the other big names are in support of UltraViolet, including Samsung, Microsoft and Sony.

UltraViolet supporters claim that the system will increase the sale of movies, since consumers will be able to actually own the movies outright and access them at their convenience. In the age of digital media, it’s all about accessibility and how much you can do on the go. VHS and CDs are virtually extinct and even paperback and single- function cameras are slowly being replaced by “sexier” multi-function devices. Although it is unclear what type of devices will be able to support the UltraViolet system, the idea is that consumers can watch the movies on up to twelve “pre-registered” hardware devices.

One challenge I see with the system is the complexity of the proposed ownership process. Firstly, only DVDs and downloaded content sold with the UltraViolet logo is eligible. Once a movie is purchased, consumers must register it and create an UltraViolet account. The account then becomes the library of the owner’s content and allows up to six people to register and access the library, or “digital locker.” In addition, up to twelve devices may be registered as well.

The second challenge and immediate question is, how does this advance the notion of accessibility on the go? However, the creators of the system are already working on incorporating what I believe to be the crucial mobility feature needed for this system to be attractive and competitive: By 2012, consumers will have the ability to download and copy onto a USB drive and thus, carry their movie library anywhere.

Lastly, how is this system going to be so different from a similar Microsoft concept that failed ten years ago? Blair Westlake, corporate vice president of Microsoft’s Media & Entertainment Group, says, “The difference here is the technology specifications have been set.” The system will first be launched in Summer 2011 before it is launched in Canada and the U.K. Time will tell whether the concept of movie ownership will take off and provide movie studios and technology companies with “iTunes-like” success.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Yeve Chitiga

Yeve Chitiga is a 2L at WCL with a strong interest in Intellectual Property and International Law. Yeve is a Junior Blogger for the IP Brief and a Junior Staff member on the American University International Law Review. She hopes to merge her passion for both areas and work on intellectual property rights in developing countries. She is currently taking Patent Law and IP in Cyberspace and loves both classes! She holds a B.S. in Business Administration with a Concentration in Accounting from Claflin University.

Yeve Chitiga has written 5 posts for the IPB.

2465One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F02%2F26%2Fultraviolet-the-itunes-of-movies%2FUltraViolet%3A+The+%22iTunes%22+of+Movies%3F2011-02-26+16%3A00%3A43Yeve+Chitigahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D2465 »

  • Eric Perrott says:
    February 26, 2011 at 1:32 PM

    This will definitely be something to watch – though I feel that one of the biggest draws of iTunes is the hardware of the iPod/iPhone etc. You basically HAVE to sync your iDevice with iTunes, which I know is the only reason that I actually use it (I know there are some other options, but they are not as smooth as just using iTunes.)
    Also, the system would be an open invitation to the jailbreaking community to breach the device (or programs?) security and unlock movies for all.
    For all of that, if enough media companies get on board and provide an easy to use system, the companies actually might have something. Great post!

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Top NBA Draft Pick Anthony Davis Hopes to Trademark Phrases Stemming from his Notorious Unibrow Halloween Costume Copyright Case: Power Rangers Fight  Copyright and Trademark Infringement Did Glee Steal from Jonathan Coulton? UPDATE: Fox News Continues Copyright Infringement Suit Against Former Democratic Senate Candidate Robin Carnahan Happy Birthday Twitter IPA! The Dance Community and Orphan Works Great Scott!  Nike Releases ‘Back to the Future’ Shoes Sole Struck A Student’s Perspective on Science and Engineering Education and Patent Prosecution Kate Middleton’s Name Is About To Be Trademark Royalty Locked Out:  Apple Gets Patent for Halal Meat Monitoring Company Accused of Bullying in UK
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
  • Oh, That’s Different … Never mind: USPTO Withdraws Ruling that IPAD MINI is “Merely Descriptive”

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License