• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured, Trademark

Mama Grizzly and Cub Seek to Protect Their Brand: Sarah and Bristol Palin’s Pending Trademark Applications

Submitted by Ashley Kobi on February 9, 2011 – 8:00 AM22405 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F02%2F09%2Fmama-grizzly-and-cub-seek-to-protect-their-brand-sarah-and-bristol-palin%25e2%2580%2599s-pending-trademark-applications%2FMama+Grizzly+and+Cub+Seek+to+Protect+Their+Brand%3A+Sarah+and+Bristol+Palin%E2%80%99s+Pending+Trademark+Applications2011-02-09+13%3A00%3A41Ashley+Kobihttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D2240

Following in the footsteps of other reality stars like The Jersey Shore’s Snooki, Sarah and Bristol Palin have filed applications to register “Sarah Palin” and “Bristol Palin” as trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

As noted by Suzi Parker at Politics Daily, celebrities often trademark their names to protect their image or brand from others who might try to cash in on their likeness or use their name in an inappropriate way.  However, political figures rarely attempt to trademark their name, unless they are seeking to prevent others from using it, for example, to sell shoddy, unapproved merchandise or “official” candidate memorabilia.

The “Bristol Palin” application was filed on September 15, 2010, which shortly predated the younger Palin’s recent appearances on Dancing with the Stars.  The application is for “educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational speaking services in the field of life choices.”  The international class identification likely relates to Bristol Palin’s role as an abstinence spokeswoman for the Candie’s Foundation, however, no example showing the mark used in commerce was attached to the application.

The “Sarah Palin” trademark registration application was filed on November 5, 2010.  The international class identifications cited in this application are for “information about political elections,” “providing a website featuring information about political issues,” and “educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational speaking services in the field of politics, culture, business and values.”

Letters sent on November 29, 2010 from Karen Bush, the trademark examining attorney assigned to review the applications, indicated that no conflicting pending or registered marks that would bar registration were found for either proposed mark.  However, there were several issues with each application.

The “Bristol Palin” application was refused registration because it was not personally signed by Bristol Palin and the application did not include Bristol’s consent to register her name as a mark.  In addition, the application failed to include “specimens” that showed the applied for mark in use in commerce for the applied for class of services – educational and entertainment services.

The “Sarah Palin” application was also refused registration due to a lack of personal signature or statement of Palin’s consent to register her name as a mark. Although Attorney Bush found the screen shot from the Washington Speakers Bureau containing Sarah Palin’s biography to be an acceptable example or “specimen” for “educational and entertainment services and motivational speaking,” she indicated that Palin’s other submitted samples did not show any commercial use connected to political elections. Palin was asked to send other examples in addition to the copy of a Fox News Channel web page dated Jan. 11, 2010 featuring a story with the headline “Palin to Join Fox News as Contributor,” and a screen shot of her Facebook profile, which accompanied Palin’s initial filing.

Both Palins have until late May to submit the additional information required to have their applications reevaluated.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Ashley Kobi

Ashley Kobi is a 2012 J.D. candidate at American University’s Washington College of Law, where she serves as a Blog Editor on the IP Brief. She is also an Articles Editor on the American University Business Law Review, a student attorney in the civil division of D.C. Law Students in Court, and a student editor for the ABA’s Annual Review of Intellectual Property Law Developments 2011. Ashley completed her undergraduate degree at Drexel University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where she studied international area studies, pre-med, and dance. Prior to starting law school, Ashley worked at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius as a litigation paralegal. During law school she has worked on pharmaceutical policy issues as a dean’s fellow at the Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property and on chemical and biological weapons proliferation prevention at the Partnership for Global Security.

Ashley Kobi has written 24 posts for the IPB.

22405 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2011%2F02%2F09%2Fmama-grizzly-and-cub-seek-to-protect-their-brand-sarah-and-bristol-palin%25e2%2580%2599s-pending-trademark-applications%2FMama+Grizzly+and+Cub+Seek+to+Protect+Their+Brand%3A+Sarah+and+Bristol+Palin%E2%80%99s+Pending+Trademark+Applications2011-02-09+13%3A00%3A41Ashley+Kobihttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D2240 »

  • Follow Sarah Palin (@FollowPalin) says:
    February 9, 2011 at 9:51 AM

    Mama Grizzly and Cub Seek to Protect Their Brand: Sarah and Bristol Palin’s… http://goo.gl/fb/j4ndG #palin #teaparty

    Reply to this comment »
  • Joseph John (@jozzjonz) says:
    February 9, 2011 at 10:02 AM

    @jozzjonz Mama Grizzly and Cub Seek to Protect Their Brand: Sarah and Bristol Palin’s …: Following in the foot… http://bit.ly/hNtZ34

    Reply to this comment »
  • Joseph John (@jozzjonz) says:
    February 9, 2011 at 10:02 AM

    @jozzjonz Mama Grizzly and Cub Seek to Protect Their Brand: Sarah and Bristol Palin’s …: Following in the foot… http://bit.ly/hNtZ34

    Reply to this comment »
  • Denise Taylor (@dentay85) says:
    February 9, 2011 at 11:04 AM

    Mama Grizzly and Cub Seek to Protect Their Brand: Sarah and Bristol Palin’s …: Following in the footsteps of o… http://bit.ly/e6eamF

    Reply to this comment »
  • Denise Taylor (@dentay85) says:
    February 9, 2011 at 11:04 AM

    Mama Grizzly and Cub Seek to Protect Their Brand: Sarah and Bristol Palin’s …: Following in the footsteps of o… http://bit.ly/e6eamF

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

The Battle of Munch Madness Amidst SOPA and DMCA, Comedian Louis C.K. Speaks to Artists’ Relationship with Pirates Intellectual Property Rights in South Sudan Is a Copyright Infringement Suit Going to Spoil the Ending to a Movie Called Catfish? Supreme Court Denies Cert: USC Triumphs Over USC in Trademark Dispute Snooky-1, Snooki- 0 Fair(y) Use – A video demonstration The House Always Wins: New York-New York Hotel & Casino, LLC v. Ronnie Katzin Where Ranting Against IP Rights Goes Wrong E-book Publishers Seek to Put Restrictions on Library Use of E-books YouTube Prevails Over Viacom In $1Billion Infringement Suit Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
  • Oh, That’s Different … Never mind: USPTO Withdraws Ruling that IPAD MINI is “Merely Descriptive”

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License