• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured, Patents

University of Glasgow Decides to Give Away Its Research to Those Who Can Use It Best

Submitted by Mark Tratos on December 15, 2010 – 8:00 AM18894 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F12%2F15%2Funiversity-of-glasgow-decides-to-give-away-its-research-to-those-who-can-use-it-best%2FUniversity+of+Glasgow+Decides+to+Give+Away+Its+Research+to+Those+Who+Can+Use+It+Best2010-12-15+13%3A00%3A07Mark+Tratoshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D1889
Taken by David Iliff

Over 30 years ago, the Bayh-Dole Act was seen as a surefire way to increase research and development in the US.  By enabling universities to retain the titles to their federally-funded research, Congress hoped that universities would be more inclined to advance science and file patents.  After filing for the patents, the universities should have licensed their research to anyone and everyone, thus facilitating faster commercialization and eventually benefiting the public in a much more effective way than any federal lab could.  Studies have shown though, that in these 30 years, the research is not getting out to the public any faster.  How do we get the research, patents, and simple scientific improvements out to the people faster?  Do as the University of Glasgow plans to do and simply give the research away.

On the 25th of November, the University of Glasgow dropped the good-deed bombshell of the year by announcing that they will offer their intellectual property to businesses and entrepreneurs free of charge.  Much of the research that the University has been developing in recent years will be available to anyone who thinks they can make the best use of it.  All you have to do is go to the University’s Easy Access IP website and start browsing.  University Principal Anton Muscatelli hopes that by transferring as much intellectual property into commercial uses as possible, the companies of the United Kingdom will be able to compete with the large research and development firms of the world.

So what is being offered for free?  There is a microchip-less “smart” label for protecting branded items.  The technology encodes a spectral fingerprint on an inexpensive piece of metal that remains hidden unless a simple reading device is used.  There is also something called a “Telomerase Promoter”, which improves suicide-gene therapy for cancer treatment.  This kind of therapy attempts to exclusively target cancerous cells in the body without harming the normal cells.  Or perhaps you work for a small internet startup and you have some great ideas for web-based video?  Then maybe you can use the video retrieval system that automatically captures daily news broadcasts and edits the broadcast according to the user’s interests.  These are just a few of the pieces of technology available to hungry entrepreneurs and businesses thanks to the University of Glasgow.

It is very refreshing to see a world-class institution take such a step and, with any luck, this will hopefully encourage other universities to do the same.  What could be incredibly interesting is to see what two different businesses do with the same piece of research.  Ideally they would both come up with their own novel and provocative uses for the technology, but it could just as easily become a race to develop the same product.  That might not necessarily be a bad thing, but such an announcement of free dissemination of knowledge does make one giddy about all the possibilities.  In any event though, kudos to the University of Glasgow for taking such a step towards furthering human progress by sharing knowledge with the world.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Mark Tratos

Mark Tratos is a fourth year evening division student at the Washington College of Law. He is the current Senior Articles Editor for the American University Intellectual Property Brief. He also works for the United States Senate. He graduated from Washington University in St. Louis in 2006. Mark has recently focused his attention to the current orphan works problem in copyright law and the impact of proposed government legislation on current intellectual property and social norms.

Mark Tratos has written 32 posts for the IPB.

18894 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F12%2F15%2Funiversity-of-glasgow-decides-to-give-away-its-research-to-those-who-can-use-it-best%2FUniversity+of+Glasgow+Decides+to+Give+Away+Its+Research+to+Those+Who+Can+Use+It+Best2010-12-15+13%3A00%3A07Mark+Tratoshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D1889 »

  • Ken says:
    December 16, 2010 at 4:35 PM

    Brilliant! Just think of the amount of innovative energy and world economic benefit that would be released if only companies with R&D would embrace this forward thinking strategy.

    I bet the first thing that any company does after picking up free technology is figuring out how to protect it.

    Research by definition is highly speculative in nature and has a very low probablity of leading to a commercially feasible product in the near-term.

    Reply to this comment »
  • IPR in the News: December 2010 « VRA Intellectual Property Rights News says:
    December 31, 2010 at 9:15 PM

    [...] University of Glasgow Decides to Give Away Its Research to Those Who Can Use It Best [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • American University Intellectual Property Brief » The Genzyme Corporation: Under Pressure for a Lack of Production says:
    March 21, 2011 at 8:02 AM

    [...] recently if the act has truly been effective, with some institutions looking to other options to allow the public to benefit from research.  The patients assert that the law was put in place to “protect the public against nonuse or [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • American University Intellectual Property Brief » Taiwan Relaxes Law Limiting Uses of Government-Owned IP says:
    November 30, 2011 at 12:01 AM

    [...] Act here in the US. While it is not as expansive as the University of Glasgow’s decision to give away all of its IP, it is a step in the right direction to aid in future technological development. [...]

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Out Fox’ed: Central District of California Judge Denies Preliminary Injunction to Fox over Dish’s AutoHop and Prime-Time-Anytime Features  Pfizer Wins Lyrica Patent Infringement Case Against Teva and Other Generic Drug Manufacturers Phony Syrup Could Send You to Prison The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Declares: Scientists Are Bad at Explaining Themselves The Early Bird Catches the Worm or Does It? : How the America Invents Act Changes U.S. Patent law “Law of Nature” Bars the Patentability of Determining the Adequate Dosage of a Drug Dissimilar Dragons Spark Infringement Suit Cell Signaling Technology Grants Patent License to Pfizer Notre Dame Forces Tornado-Ravaged High School to Change Mascot The PROSUR approach to patents: shared information, independent decisions Mark Twain’s Autobiography:  In the Public Domain Before the Public’s Hands? Fela! Under Fire: Author of Biography Files Copyright Infringement Suit Against Show’s Production Company
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License