• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Copyright, Daily Blog, Featured

Paging Lime Wire: The Copyright Battle Needs a Few More Definitions

Submitted by Cesar Fishman on October 26, 2010 – 9:59 AM14693 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F10%2F26%2Fpaging-lime-wire-the-copyright-battle-needs-a-few-more-definitions%2FPaging+Lime+Wire%3A+The+Copyright+Battle+Needs+a+Few+More+Definitions2010-10-26+14%3A59%3A10Cesar+Fishmanhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D1469

Lime Wire, LLC, is the operator of a popular website that allows users to download free music from other members. This system, which I talked about in a previous post, allows users to browse a selection of songs that other members have uploaded onto the system.

Needless to say, Lime Wire was found guilty of copyright infringement in two cases that were tried in the Southern District of New York. Though both of these cases have been pretty standard for the current anti-piracy atmosphere that exists in this country, what is very interesting is the way the cases were brought about and how Lime Wire is responding to the guilty verdict.

The first case, Arista Records LLC v. Lime Wire LLC, is brought forth by a multitude of labels, owners of the copyright of the recordings. The second case, EMI April Music Inc. v. Lime Wire LLC, is a case brought forth by the publishers, who have copyright over the actual songs. In response, Lime Wire has attempted to mitigate damages by arguing that albums are one infringement rather than an infringement for each track.

This move seems like it probably will not work because there are separate copyrights for each song as each song is separately considered as a piece of intellectual property. However, the court of the SDNY will have a chance to answer an interesting question. Is a music album a portfolio with a collection of works all independent from each other or, is an album an artistic piece that is composed of various pieces? Would this argument be stronger for music albums that tell a story using each track as a chapter, like Tommy by The Who or American Idiot by Green Day? What about audio books that separate each chapter by track? Is each track that is illegally “shared” an infringement of the book’s copyright? In an age where few people buy entire albums but rather buy individual tracks online, this question seems like a throwback to the age of LPs, where listening to an entire album, beginning to end, was very commonplace. Some artists from this era view their works as entire albums and not just song by song. Just ask Pink Floyd whether or not they appreciate concept albums being cut up and prepackaged into individual 4-minute tracks by the iTunes Generation.

The decision this court has to make can be really simple, or the court can take the opportunity to delve into this issue, and provide clarity. Lime Wire’s lawyer, Joseph Baio, has opened a door in his motion to reduce the damages assessed to Lime Wire, which could top 1.5 billion dollars. Now it’s up to the court to decide whether they want to walk through it.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Cesar Fishman

Cesar Fishman is a 2L at American University - Washington College of Law. Cesar is interested in fair trade issues, consumer protection, criminal law, and antitrust issues. Cesar has been published numerous times, most notably in the Miami Herald and has had his fiction featured in McSweeney's. He also likes writing, playing music, cooking, reading, oxford commas, and black jellybeans.

Cesar Fishman has written 7 posts for the IPB.

14693 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F10%2F26%2Fpaging-lime-wire-the-copyright-battle-needs-a-few-more-definitions%2FPaging+Lime+Wire%3A+The+Copyright+Battle+Needs+a+Few+More+Definitions2010-10-26+14%3A59%3A10Cesar+Fishmanhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D1469 »

  • Tweets that mention American University Intellectual Property Brief » Paging Lime Wire: The Copyright Battle Needs a Few More Definitions -- Topsy.com says:
    October 26, 2010 at 1:38 PM

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Munira, patesalo. patesalo said: Paging Lime Wire: The Copyright Battle Needs a Few More Definitions – American University Intellectual Property Brief http://paten.to/dv1R1C [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • Gabe Carrera says:
    October 27, 2010 at 9:30 AM

    This seems like an issue that "definitely needs delving into."

    Reply to this comment »
  • Plaw says:
    November 17, 2010 at 2:01 PM

    What will also be interesting is how this court will decide based on the recent opinion by the 2nd Circuit in Bryant v. Media Right Prods

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D printing is the hot new topic in the tech world and with it come some possible issues related to safeguarding intellectual property. This two part post evaluates the possible issues that may arise due to 3D printing and why there isn’t any cause for alarm, yet.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Volume 3, Issue 3 of the American University Intellectual Property Brief Now Available! Neil Young Trademarks Digital Audio Format and Online Store, Intends to Improve Digital Media E-book Publishers Seek to Put Restrictions on Library Use of E-books Sen. Feinstein’s Amendment Set Aside 87-13; One Step Closer to Patent Reform Apple Faces Lawsuit in China over Siri Who won in Sony's PS3 Jailbreak Battle? Top NBA Draft Pick Anthony Davis Hopes to Trademark Phrases Stemming from his Notorious Unibrow Hope, Bon-Mot, Copyrights, Money: a Chilean Experience Short Circuit: October 1 - 17, 2012 Obama Creates IP Enforcement Advisory Committees A Fracas about Fragrance: Copyright’s Application to Perfume Copyright and Your Student Aid: MPAA Sends Letters to Universities About Copyright Provisions In the Higher Education Opportunity Act Couple seeks to trademark “Occupy Wall Street”
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • 3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright
  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License