• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured, Trademark

Twitter Makes a Strong Case For “Flying Bird” Logo

Submitted by Eric Perrott on October 5, 2010 – 10:10 AM1321One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F10%2F05%2Ftwitter-makes-a-strong-case-for-%25e2%2580%259cflying-bird%25e2%2580%259d-logo%2FTwitter+Makes+a+Strong+Case+For+%E2%80%9CFlying+Bird%E2%80%9D+Logo2010-10-05+15%3A10%3A47Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D1321

Twitter has begrudgingly become ubiquitous in the technology and social media worlds and now it is applying to trademark it’s “flying bird” logo with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. While some believe that this will be difficult, I believe that Twitter has become sufficiently known by their logo and that the relevant consumer would not be confused by the 8,000 other “flying-bird” related trademarks filed with the Trademark Office.

In order for a symbol to become a trademark, it must not cause confusion with a previous mark. If the Twitter bird could have ever been confused with another “flying bird” logo, its marketing efforts and stylistic design make it uniquely distinctive in the eye of the relevant consumer. Twitter now has over 105,000,000 registered users and while no official survey evidence has been released, I would bet that the Twitter logo would be widely recognizable by the relevant consumer and even by the American people at large.

However, an unintended consequence might come from the enforcement of this trademark, should Twitter achieve registration of the “flying bird” logo. Twitter is accessed through third-party apps by 75% of twitter users and many of those third-party developers use a similar Twitter logo in marketing their app. Twitter might risk alienating devoted third-party developers, or stifle growth of new innovative uses of the Twitter API.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Eric Perrott

Eric is a Washington College of Law alumnus and was the 2011-2012 Editor-in-Chief of the IPBrief. Eric enjoys writing and playing music with his band, movies, and eating.

Eric Perrott has written 44 posts for the IPB.

1321One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F10%2F05%2Ftwitter-makes-a-strong-case-for-%25e2%2580%259cflying-bird%25e2%2580%259d-logo%2FTwitter+Makes+a+Strong+Case+For+%E2%80%9CFlying+Bird%E2%80%9D+Logo2010-10-05+15%3A10%3A47Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D1321 »

  • Tweets that mention American University Intellectual Property Brief » Twitter Makes a Strong Case For “Flying Bird” Logo -- Topsy.com says:
    October 5, 2010 at 11:20 AM

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Logo Design News, Mary Cala and technology updates, The IP Brief. The IP Brief said: New post, Twitter Makes a Strong Case For “Flying Bird” Logo – http://tinyurl.com/22oomfo [...]

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

YouTube Videos at the Guggenheim: Some Judicial Aspects of an Exhibition Judge Rules Against Generic Drug Manufacturers in Crestor Patent Challenge Campaign for Chang(ing our Branding Strategy): Obama Campaign Sues D.C. Website for Trademark Infringement After Unauthorized Use of Rising Sun Mark Edgenet, Inc. v. Home Depot: Edgenet gets the hammer The Federal Circuit Defers to the Lower Court, Invalidates Social Networking Patent Short Circuit: July 15 - 31, 2012 Twentieth Century Fox Sued Over “Glee” Trademark Apple Mapping Out the Future Slaying Patent Trolls For Fun and Profit! WIPO Agrees to Support South American IP Project Confessions of a “Jailbreaker” Congress Holds Hearings on Unauthorized Public Performances [Part 2 of 2]
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
  • Oh, That’s Different … Never mind: USPTO Withdraws Ruling that IPAD MINI is “Merely Descriptive”

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License