• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured, Patents

Unit License Rights and the Rise of IP Finance

Submitted by JJ Gottschalk on August 29, 2010 – 8:46 PM9833 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F08%2F29%2Funit-license-rights-and-the-rise-of-ip-finance%2FUnit+License+Rights+and+the+Rise+of+IP+Finance2010-08-30+01%3A46%3A46JJ+Gottschalkhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D983

From: http://www.ipxi.com/sites/all/themes/zen/ipxi/logo.pngThe world’s first patent exchange is set to open in the near future, with initial listees to be named next month according to IAM magazine. IPXI, or Intellectual Property Exchange International, will be “a marketplace that facilitates the investment in and risk management of IP-related assets.” This market will function much like the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) and is conveniently being run by CCX’s former President  & COO, Gerald J. Pannekoek.

The basic structure of the exchange will allow investors to trade licenses in patents and other IP holdings. These licenses will then be divided into Unit License Rights (ULRs) whereby investors can buy and sell like any other form of stock. This listing house will not just incorporate private enterprise portfolios but also conceivably the portfolios of many university’s technology transfer offices. For now, membership is open to organizations that are able to submit portfolios for listing that have a combined estimated minimum market value of $50 million, as well as a sizeable and successful licensing history.

It will certainly be interesting to not only see what companies/organizations decide to be the original participants on this exchange but also to see the institutional demand for this type of investing. Certainly IP valuation and monetization is very intriguing and hopefully will offer benefits to large patent holding companies. However, much like other derivatives, monetizing intangible assets is not without risk. While companies such as Ocean Tomo (who is also spearheading the launch of IPXI) have had success in the creation of an index based around patent rights (see Ocean Tomo 300), other so-called “patent trolls” like Intellectual Ventures have not faired so well. In fact, one such company, IP Bewertung, recently filed for bankruptcy after failing to market their patent holdings successfully.  In the end, with all emerging investment vehicles, market demand and knowledge of the assets will decide whether IPXI is ultimately successful.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: JJ Gottschalk

JJ Gottschalk is a 3L at the Washington College of Law. JJ is a graduate of The George Washington University where he majored in International Business. During his undergraduate studies, JJ interned at the Department of Commerce in the Office of the International Intellectual Property Coordinator. JJ's IP interests include IP finance and IP protection in trade agreements.

JJ Gottschalk has written 23 posts for the IPB.

9833 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F08%2F29%2Funit-license-rights-and-the-rise-of-ip-finance%2FUnit+License+Rights+and+the+Rise+of+IP+Finance2010-08-30+01%3A46%3A46JJ+Gottschalkhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D983 »

  • Jon Mole says:
    August 29, 2010 at 9:21 PM

    Very interesting concept. The Ocean Tomo guys have had some interesting ideas so I look forward to seeing how this plays out. The key will be if they can get some large, IP-rich companies to participate. We’ll know when the name list is released.

    Reply to this comment »
    • JJ Gottschalk says:
      August 31, 2010 at 3:03 PM

      Thanks, I think the industry has huge growth potential, but faces the same scrutiny as other investment vehicles in that institutions are the ones primarily driving the value of the asset. While certainly patents have value in their potential license or recovery in the case of infringement, for the most part the patents that these patent holders control are by and large not being used. Unless a company such as IPXI or Ocean Tomo can really string together a bunch of successful patents, the ULR could ultimately go the way of mortgage-backed securities.

      Reply to this comment »
  • Bree Miller says:
    September 1, 2010 at 12:10 PM

    Thanks, JJ Gottschalk, for writing about IPXI and our Unit License Right (ULR)™ contract product. As described in your post, “membership is open to organizations that are able to submit portfolios for listing that have a combined estimated minimum market value of $50 million, as well as a sizeable and successful licensing history.” While this type of Membership of this type is available, IPXI Membership is also open to a larger universe of entities, and exists in the following categories: Founding Members, Regular Members, Associate Members, and Daily Members.

    Founding Members are those described in your post – they agree to place patent portfolios on the Exchange having an anticipated minimum aggregate value of $50 million. Alternatively, Founding Members can join IPXI under agreement to purchase all relevant ULR contracts offered on the Exchange.

    Regular Members include companies interested in further developing the rules and operation of the Exchange, Practicing Entities required to purchase certain ULR contracts, and Qualified Institutional Buyers. Regular Members make no commitment to issue ULR contracts.

    Associate Members include interested parties that are not IP market participants but wish to support the development of the Exchange.

    Daily Members are entities that have agreed to become a Member of the Exchange solely with respect to specifically identified ULR contracts only and for a limited time.

    More information on IPXI Membership can be found at http://www.ipxi.com/membership

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D printing is the hot new topic in the tech world and with it come some possible issues related to safeguarding intellectual property. This two part post evaluates the possible issues that may arise due to 3D printing and why there isn’t any cause for alarm, yet.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Galliano wins in Cybersquatting Case The Copyright Office Considers the Possibility of Bringing Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Under Federal Copyright Battle of the Knits Actor in Inflammatory Movie Asserts Copyright in Performance, Sues Everybody to Distance Themselves From Controversy No Patent for Simple Math: Uniloc USA Loses to Rackspace in Suit Pitting Patent Troll Against Open Source Software Company Peace, Harmony, and Lawsuits?: Yoga-Wear Juggernaught Lululemon Athletica Brings Design Patent Suit Against Calvin Klein in Bid to Protect Patented Yoga Pant Designs.  Another Day, Another Nail in the § 101 Coffin: Internet-Advertising Patent Subject Matter Challenge Falls Flat Brave: Pixar's Ode to Atlanta Baseball No Teenage Dream: Katy Perry Tour Merchandiser Initiates Trademark Infringement Suit Non-profit Turf Wars: The Challenges When Every Group Is “Where There Is A Sea There Are Pirates.”  The Pirate Bay Threatens To Live Up To Its Name
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • 3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright
  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License