• Home
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
  • Vol. 3, Issue 2
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Video

Blog posts featuring video clips.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured, Trademark

Snooky-1, Snooki- 0

Submitted by Nina Mantilla on August 29, 2010 – 8:50 PM9852 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F08%2F29%2Fsnooky-1-snooki-0%2FSnooky-1%2C+Snooki-+02010-08-30+01%3A50%3A04Nina+Mantillahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D985

Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi from MTV’s The Jersey Shore, a reality show that chronicles the party antics of some of New Jersey’s finest youths, has been through a lot recently.  So naturally, when I heard that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied Snooki’s application to trademark her signature nickname for use in “entertainment in the nature of personal appearances by a television personality,” I was almost as distraught as the last six times Sammi Sweetheart and Ronnie, the TV show’s power couple, broke up on camera. The U.S. PTO states that Snooki’s trademark would be too similar to an existing trademark registered for the children’s book The Adventures of Snooky.  The standard for denying trademarks is “likelihood of confusion” between the two marks. Snooky is referred to by one Amazon.com customer as “a good role model for children,” and Snooki is also a good role model for children.  The Adventures of Snooky is filled with holographic images, and coincidentally, so are the adventures of real-life Snooki. Given these striking similarities, I can see why the U.S. PTO would deny the trademark.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Nina Mantilla

Nina Mantilla is a 2L at Washington College of Law. She is interested in trademarks, copyrights, and trade secret law. As an undergrad at University of Virginia, she majored in history. Nina also enjoys drinking coffee, hanging around WCL, and dancing.

Nina Mantilla has written 9 posts for the IPB.

9852 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F08%2F29%2Fsnooky-1-snooki-0%2FSnooky-1%2C+Snooki-+02010-08-30+01%3A50%3A04Nina+Mantillahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D985 »

  • Eric says:
    August 31, 2010 at 9:36 AM

    I really love this story. I bet she didn’t even know anything about trying to trademark her name and now she is the laughing stock of the IP community…which I’m sure she also doesn’t care about because, well, she’s famous.

    Reply to this comment »
  • Dana says:
    August 31, 2010 at 3:10 PM

    Hilarious! I wonder if Snooki could define “trademark” if asked directly…

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada

Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada

Despite the tremendous opposition to SOPA and PIPA in the United States, lobbyists are pushing Canada to incorporate SOPA-like provisions into Bill C-11, Canada’s latest attempt to toughen their copyright protections. Michael Geist, a Canadian …

More articles »

Patents »

Kodak: An Example of What Not to do With Your Patents.

Kodak: An Example of What Not to do With Your Patents.

Kodak has been buying up patents for a technology that competes with its old film technology in order to keep its dying film market alive. However, its impending bankruptcy most likely means that only the patents it holds can save it.

More articles »

Trademark »

The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent

The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent

Louboutin appeals a trial court’s decision to not enforce protection for his trademarked red soles. The trial court’s decision and the appeal highlight some interesting issues surrounding color trademark protection. The appellate court should not grant Louboutin trademark protection of his red soles because it could impermissibly hurt competition.

More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Sony and Universal Music Say, “BRILLIANT!” Halal Meat Monitoring Company Accused of Bullying in UK Fall 2010 – Vol. 2, Issue 2 is now available! Can’t Read a Law Review Article?  Read a Comic Book Where Twitter Messed Up The Copyright Office Considers the Possibility of Bringing Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Under Federal Copyright Le Google Strikes Deal in La France: Largest French Publisher to Provide Books to Be Scanned by Google Is a Copyright Infringement Suit Going to Spoil the Ending to a Movie Called Catfish?
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent
  • Keep Off Kardashians! The Gap Fights Back, Retaliates to Kim K’s Suit Over Alleged Misappropriation of Her Celebrity Persona
  • Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada
  • Jailbreaking Exemption to Expire in 2012
  • Grooveshark Sued: Will the Safe Harbor Shield it from Liability?

Twitter

  • The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent - http://t.co/1uHllGB8 by Brandon Marsh
  • Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada - http://t.co/c1We3GjL by Carrie Sager
  • Jailbreaking Exemption to Expire in 2012 - http://t.co/nLWKOJcI by Alexandra Mackey
  • Grooveshark Sued: Will the Safe Harbor Shield it from Liability? - http://t.co/Lu88Zjs7 by Corsica Smith
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License