• Home
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
  • Vol. 3, Issue 2
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Video

Blog posts featuring video clips.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured

Blizzard Entertainment and World of Warcraft Win a Treasure from Infringers

Submitted by Mark Tratos on August 19, 2010 – 2:25 PM8745 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F08%2F19%2Fblizzard-entertainment-and-world-of-warcraft-win-a-treasure-from-infringers%2FBlizzard+Entertainment+and+World+of+Warcraft+Win+a+Treasure+from+Infringers2010-08-19+19%3A25%3A37Mark+Tratoshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D874

How are your “l33t skillz?”  If they are anything like mine, the idea of playing video games online is a recipe for disaster.  I get stressed playing games on “easy” mode and being soundly beaten online by a 12-year old is not my definition of a good time.  That being said, I love video games.  While I have never actually played World of Warcraft, I can understand the appeal.  The ability to be someone entirely different, living in a world of impossibility and fantasy, making friends with people around the world, and all the while paying $15 a month to do so.   Fifteen dollars a month per user has a created a $1.5 billion-a-year franchise for Blizzard Entertainment.  When you are making that much money a year, you would protect your baby with the entire force of the judiciary branch if necessary.  That is just what Blizzard did.

A federal court just awarded Blizzard Entertainment the staggering amount of $89 million in damages.  Who could cause that much damage?  A company called Scapegaming and the company’s creator, Alyson Reeves.  Apparently Scapegaming earned about $3 million in profits by collecting “micropayments” from World of Warcraft users on an unauthorized network.  The private network allowed users to have god-like powers throughout the game and allowed users to cheat in various other ways.  Blizzard sued Scapegaming for violating end-user agreements by attempting to profit from the users cheating.  The court decided that violations of these end-user licensing agreements constituted infringement.  Then the court brought the full force of the law.

The judge awarded Blizzard $3 million in lost profits, $63,600 in attorneys’ fees and $85.5 million in statutory damages for willful infringement.  An appeal is expected, but this does not look good for Scapegaming.  This case could set the precedent Blizzard needs to go after numerous other third party servers that exist around the Internet.  So those of you with “mad skillz” should stick to the legitimate servers and take it easy on me when I venture into Azeroth as a Night Elf Mohawk.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Mark Tratos

Mark Tratos is a fourth year evening division student at the Washington College of Law. He is the current Senior Articles Editor for the American University Intellectual Property Brief. He also works for the United States Senate. He graduated from Washington University in St. Louis in 2006. Mark has recently focused his attention to the current orphan works problem in copyright law and the impact of proposed government legislation on current intellectual property and social norms.

Mark Tratos has written 32 posts for the IPB.

8745 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F08%2F19%2Fblizzard-entertainment-and-world-of-warcraft-win-a-treasure-from-infringers%2FBlizzard+Entertainment+and+World+of+Warcraft+Win+a+Treasure+from+Infringers2010-08-19+19%3A25%3A37Mark+Tratoshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D874 »

  • Blizzard Entertainment and World of Warcraft Win a Treasure from Infringers – American University Intellectual Property Brief | Warcraft Ink says:
    August 19, 2010 at 3:52 PM

    [...] Blizzard Entertainment and World of Warcraft Win a Treasure from InfringersAmerican University Intellectual Property BriefWhile I have never actually played World of Warcraft, I can understand the appeal. The ability to be someone entirely different, living in a world of … [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • » Blizzard Entertainment and World of Warcraft Win a Treasure from Infringers – American University Intellectual Property Brief says:
    August 19, 2010 at 10:29 PM

    [...] Blizzard Entertainment and World of Warcraft Win a Treasure from InfringersAmerican University Intellectual Property BriefWhile I have never actually played World of Warcraft, I can understand the appeal. The ability to be someone entirely different, living in a world of … [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • Ultra Pro Protector Series - Green Shields Sleeve 100 ct « wowlvlguides.com says:
    August 20, 2010 at 5:04 AM

    [...] Blizzard Entertainment and World of Warcraft Win a Treasure from InfringersAmerican University Intellectual Property BriefWhile I have never actually played World of Warcraft, I can understand the appeal. The ability to be someone entirely different, living in a world of … [...]

    Reply to this comment »
  • Eric says:
    August 22, 2010 at 4:41 PM

    Ha! Loved the post. I too love video games but was never into World of Warcraft or similar games. I wonder what kind of precedent this sets for these company’s that sell in-game currency for real money? Is that a form of cheating within the game?

    Reply to this comment »
    • Mark Tratos says:
      August 25, 2010 at 9:12 AM

      Actually, Professor Rosser at WCL has entire class devoted to such a topic. He lectures about the development of “online property” and how it is traded in the real world. His lecture focuses on the game Everquest, but the same principles apply to World of Warcraft. Currently, there is no law saying that one person cannot sell an item in a game for real money. The problem you run into, at least I suspect, is how do you enforce such a transaction? Is that just state contract law or are we dealing with larger property issues here?

      Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada

Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada

Despite the tremendous opposition to SOPA and PIPA in the United States, lobbyists are pushing Canada to incorporate SOPA-like provisions into Bill C-11, Canada’s latest attempt to toughen their copyright protections. Michael Geist, a Canadian …

More articles »

Patents »

Kodak: An Example of What Not to do With Your Patents.

Kodak: An Example of What Not to do With Your Patents.

Kodak has been buying up patents for a technology that competes with its old film technology in order to keep its dying film market alive. However, its impending bankruptcy most likely means that only the patents it holds can save it.

More articles »

Trademark »

The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent

The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent

Louboutin appeals a trial court’s decision to not enforce protection for his trademarked red soles. The trial court’s decision and the appeal highlight some interesting issues surrounding color trademark protection. The appellate court should not grant Louboutin trademark protection of his red soles because it could impermissibly hurt competition.

More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

The Unimaginable Happened: Google Sued for Copyright Infringement Removing the E-PARASITES Google to Restrict “Jailbroken” Android Phones From Accessing New YouTube Features The Treacherous Pact Between French Authors and YouTube Volume 2, Issue 3 of the Intellectual Property Brief is now available! Sen. Feinstein’s Amendment Set Aside 87-13; One Step Closer to Patent Reform Is a Copyright Infringement Suit Going to Spoil the Ending to a Movie Called Catfish? Ninth Circuit Issues New Ruling in Bratz v. Barbie Case Where Ranting Against IP Rights Goes Wrong Going “Up”? Utah Homebuilder Transports Residents to the Fantasy World of Disney’s “Up” The Copyright Office Considers the Possibility of Bringing Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Under Federal Copyright Trans-Pacific Partnership Discussion on TRIPS-Plus Standards
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent
  • Keep Off Kardashians! The Gap Fights Back, Retaliates to Kim K’s Suit Over Alleged Misappropriation of Her Celebrity Persona
  • Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada
  • Jailbreaking Exemption to Expire in 2012
  • Grooveshark Sued: Will the Safe Harbor Shield it from Liability?

Twitter

  • The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent - http://t.co/1uHllGB8 by Brandon Marsh
  • Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada - http://t.co/c1We3GjL by Carrie Sager
  • Jailbreaking Exemption to Expire in 2012 - http://t.co/nLWKOJcI by Alexandra Mackey
  • Grooveshark Sued: Will the Safe Harbor Shield it from Liability? - http://t.co/Lu88Zjs7 by Corsica Smith
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License