• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Columns, Copyright, Daily Blog, Featured

Confessions of a “Jailbreaker”

Submitted by Eric Perrott on August 1, 2010 – 2:31 PM753One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F08%2F01%2Fconfessions-of-a-%25e2%2580%259cjailbreaker%25e2%2580%259d%2FConfessions+of+a+%E2%80%9CJailbreaker%E2%80%9D2010-08-01+19%3A31%3A27Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D753

I have a confession to make and I really need to get this out.  I am a jailbreaker.  I used to live in secrecy, running applications on my Apple® iPhone® that allowed me to brighten the screen in one touch (the horror!), fit 5 icons across the screen (criminal!), or even have multitasking with a custom application launcher (wait, that’s actually pretty cool . . . thief!!!!).  Fortunately, with the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s addition of “jailbreaking” to the list of exceptions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, I can now regain my place in society.

Jailbreaking an iPhone is, sadly, not nearly as nefarious as it sounds.  It involves using computer software to change the iPhone’s operating system firmware so that third-party applications can be run.  Third-party application repositories, such as Cydia or Rock, store these third-party apps and make them available to users (some are free, some are not).  The applications themselves are not approved by Apple, but really show the potential for the iPhone and iPad.  Does it change the user experience?  Yes, it can. Certain applications kill the battery a lot quicker, and some customizations can get extremely confusing for basic level users.

To be fair, my confession is somewhat tainted, as I (and many of my closest friends) never considered jailbreaking to be illegal in the first place.  But now, I can proclaim it to the heavens that I JAILBREAK MY PHONE.  Under the new exceptions, modifications to smartphone firmware cannot be prosecuted under the DMCA.  While no one has ever been prosecuted for jailbreaking, this opens the door for talented programmers to invest both time and money into, basically, showing Apple what it needs in iOS 5.0 and 6.0 and . . . well, you get the point.

While this ruling is a victory for the me’s of the world (the end-user), this does not stop Apple from setting up more and more copyright protection systems to protect their firmware. Additionally, it does not make the distribution of illegal hacking software legal.  But rest assured, every time Apple ups the ante with new protections, the community of talented hackers goes at it with full force, expanding the abilities and value of these Apple products.

So there is my confession.  I can now move on with my life and join the ranks of the mainstream smartphone world without sulking in the digital shadows.  Farewell, I have to go play “A Link to the Past” on my iPhone SNES emulator using a Bluetooth wiimote as a controller.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Eric Perrott

Eric is a Washington College of Law alumnus and was the 2011-2012 Editor-in-Chief of the IPBrief. Eric enjoys writing and playing music with his band, movies, and eating.

Eric Perrott has written 44 posts for the IPB.

753One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F08%2F01%2Fconfessions-of-a-%25e2%2580%259cjailbreaker%25e2%2580%259d%2FConfessions+of+a+%E2%80%9CJailbreaker%E2%80%9D2010-08-01+19%3A31%3A27Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D753 »

  • American University Intellectual Property Brief » Who won in Sony’s PS3 Jailbreak Battle? says:
    April 13, 2011 at 9:03 AM

    [...] the legality of jailbreaking for iPhones gives some a reason to celebrate, PS3 hackers shouldn’t assume that they too should be able to legally customize their videogame [...]

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D printing is the hot new topic in the tech world and with it come some possible issues related to safeguarding intellectual property. This two part post evaluates the possible issues that may arise due to 3D printing and why there isn’t any cause for alarm, yet.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

A Question of Moral Rights in the United States Privacy in the Time of Google Did Glee Steal from Jonathan Coulton? Is a Copyright Infringement Suit Going to Spoil the Ending to a Movie Called Catfish? Short Circuit: August 1 - 15, 2012 Copyright Infringement and YouTube Microsoft v. i4i Decided: IP Community Crisis Averted? With Google and UK’s Political Elite – It’s All in the Family Ethical Issues in IP Litigation Three Stripes, You’re Out! Power Balance Sues Microsoft for Trade Dress Infringement Trade Secrets Bill Would Open Private Federal Litigation Chanel Avoids Genericide By Taking Its Trademark Seriously
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • 3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright
  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License