• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Copyright, Daily Blog, Featured, Video

Fundraising Video Created by Ten Year Old for Children’s Hospice Falls Under Copyright Scrutiny

Submitted by Eric Perrott on July 23, 2010 – 8:22 AM6802 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F07%2F23%2Ffundraising-video-created-by-ten-year-old-for-children%25e2%2580%2599s-hospice-falls-under-copyright-scrutiny%2FFundraising+Video+Created+by+Ten+Year+Old+for+Children%E2%80%99s+Hospice+Falls+Under+Copyright+Scrutiny2010-07-23+13%3A22%3A21Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D680

Okay, we get it. Copyright is complicated and publishers must protect their investments from infringement.

But sometimes, well, publishers don’t have to be such jerks about it.

This headline just about says it all:

A young UK girl who made a Charlie Chaplin tribute video to raise money for a children’s hospice has been hit by publishers for copyright theft.

Ten-year-old Bethany Hare, a young girl from the UK, sang the Chaplin song “Smile” for a short Internet fundraising video.  The video, seen below, was created in order to raise money for Martin House, a children’s hospice in Yorkshire.

The villain in this story, U.S.-based Bourne Music Company, owns the copyright to “Smile.”  The company recently demanded that the copyrighted song be removed from the video.  After Bethany’s mom pleaded with the company, it allowed them to use the song, contingent upon a $2200 fee, in addition to a $280 fee every time they perform it live.  Oh Bourne Music, your generosity is astounding.

To top it off, Bethany used her own money to make the video, money she made playing a child extra in a British soap opera.  Yes, the ten year old spent her own money to create this video.

“Bethany has no savings left,” her mother reported to charity website JustGiving, “and will therefore not be able to afford any fees – we hope you will now appreciate a silent movie instead.”

Coverage on YouTube

By Eric Perrott

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Eric Perrott

Eric is a Washington College of Law alumnus and was the 2011-2012 Editor-in-Chief of the IPBrief. Eric enjoys writing and playing music with his band, movies, and eating.

Eric Perrott has written 44 posts for the IPB.

6802 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F07%2F23%2Ffundraising-video-created-by-ten-year-old-for-children%25e2%2580%2599s-hospice-falls-under-copyright-scrutiny%2FFundraising+Video+Created+by+Ten+Year+Old+for+Children%E2%80%99s+Hospice+Falls+Under+Copyright+Scrutiny2010-07-23+13%3A22%3A21Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D680 »

  • Ali says:
    July 23, 2010 at 9:22 AM

    Wow. Just wow.

    That’s almost as bad as this one: http://techdirt.com/articles/20100716/15281610251.shtml (Headline: Performance Rights Group Takes Down YouTube Video Of Auschwitz Survivor Dancing To ‘I Will Survive’ At Auschwitz)

    I seriously hope these are automatic takedowns, and that the rights owners didn’t really want to enforce these copyrights after they knew these stories…

    Reply to this comment »
  • ViabGrariaDig says:
    May 27, 2011 at 9:45 PM

    Hi!
    I was reading your forum for a long time now and just thought I might wanna get an profile here and comment once in a while.

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Biomedical Patent Found Invalid in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories Media Producers Hate Digital Distribution's Players, When They Should Hate the Game IBM Faces Antitrust Claim Before European Commission Fall 2010 Blogger Positions Available New Restrictions on Pay-for-Delay Generic Deals Pass in the House J.R.R. Tolkien’s Estate Files Suit Against Warner Brothers: Can the Adversaries Find Some Middle-Earth? USPTO Attempts to Tackle Trademark Bullying My Dough Girl, Pillsbury’s Dough Boy: A Trademark Dispute Secret Apple, Stolen iPhone 4G? U.S. Senators Continue War On Internet with “Online Infringement” Bill
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
  • Oh, That’s Different … Never mind: USPTO Withdraws Ruling that IPAD MINI is “Merely Descriptive”

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License