• Home
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
  • Vol. 3, Issue 2
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Video

Blog posts featuring video clips.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Home » Copyright, Daily Blog, Featured

Fair and Balanced Infringement

Submitted by Mark Tratos on July 14, 2010 – 5:49 PM582No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F07%2F14%2Ffair-and-balanced-infringement%2FFair+and+Balanced+Infringement2010-07-14+22%3A49%3A37Mark+Tratoshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D582

A New York federal judge denied Fox News’ attempt to dismiss a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement, breach of contract, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty and accounting, deceptive trade practices, unjust enrichment, and unfair competition.

Kenneth Stadt, the exclusive owner of a video of Bernie Madoff and his wife on a yacht in St. Tropez in 2003, brought suit, claiming that he entered into a license agreement with Fox News to allow Fox to use the footage for 45 days in exchange for $10,000 but Fox continued to use the footage after the end date on the agreement.  After Stadt sent a cease and desist letter, a new license agreement was made for another 45 days and $50,000 but Fox News continued to use the footage after the time agreed to in their second contract as well.

Fox attempted to dismiss all claims, except copyright, because the Copyright Act preempts state-based claims.  The judge found, however, that Stadt’s claim of breach of contract was based on more than unauthorized use.  Fox News credited the video as a “Fox News Exclusive” every time the images ran on the network.  Since this extra element is not governed by the Copyright Act, that was enough, in the judge’s eyes, to keep the claim alive.  Taking credit for the “exclusive” may be just enough to breach a contract and should bring some interesting litigation.

This is just another notch in Fox News’ belt in regards to problems with the footage it has been airing.  Fox News was sued in January over the airing of an interview with Michael Jackson’s ex-wife that they did not have the rights for.  Let’s also not forget Jon Stewart calling Fox News’ Sean Hannity out last year for airing footage of one Tea Party rally and trying to pass it off as another rally (Hannity’s apology still leaves me wanting more).  I won’t pretend to be a fan of Fox News and I will admit that these lawsuits will probably not stop their domination of the ratings, but how fair and balanced are you when you breach your contracts and infringe on the rights of the everyday Americans to whom you deliver the news?  Maybe Stadt was leading the cause of liberalism and a fair and balanced Sean Hannity was just fighting back with liberty.

Read an article on Mr. Stadt’s claim and the response of the judge at The Hollywood Reporter.

Mark Tratos

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Mark Tratos

Mark Tratos is a fourth year evening division student at the Washington College of Law. He is the current Senior Articles Editor for the American University Intellectual Property Brief. He also works for the United States Senate. He graduated from Washington University in St. Louis in 2006. Mark has recently focused his attention to the current orphan works problem in copyright law and the impact of proposed government legislation on current intellectual property and social norms.

Mark Tratos has written 32 posts for the IPB.

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada

Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada

Despite the tremendous opposition to SOPA and PIPA in the United States, lobbyists are pushing Canada to incorporate SOPA-like provisions into Bill C-11, Canada’s latest attempt to toughen their copyright protections. Michael Geist, a Canadian …

More articles »

Patents »

Kodak: An Example of What Not to do With Your Patents.

Kodak: An Example of What Not to do With Your Patents.

Kodak has been buying up patents for a technology that competes with its old film technology in order to keep its dying film market alive. However, its impending bankruptcy most likely means that only the patents it holds can save it.

More articles »

Trademark »

The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent

The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent

Louboutin appeals a trial court’s decision to not enforce protection for his trademarked red soles. The trial court’s decision and the appeal highlight some interesting issues surrounding color trademark protection. The appellate court should not grant Louboutin trademark protection of his red soles because it could impermissibly hurt competition.

More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

In Trademark Dispute, Cricket Beats GSM Cellular Greater Protection in China?: China’s Intellectual Property Rights Developments in 2011 Wii Would Like to Play: Nintendo Defends Wii Technology on First-to-Market and First-to-File Grounds Brewery Battles and Upper-Level Employee Woes Software Patents: The Case for Harmonization of European and American Law Through American Decisiveness and Leadership Twitter Makes a Strong Case For “Flying Bird” Logo Final Announcement: Fall 2011 Submissions Due Today Judge Dismisses Copyright Infringement Case Against UCLA I Can Has Copyright Law: Ben Huh of the Cheezburger Network Talks About the Internet and Copyright UPDATE: Fox News Continues Copyright Infringement Suit Against Former Democratic Senate Candidate Robin Carnahan Confessions of a “Jailbreaker”
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent
  • Keep Off Kardashians! The Gap Fights Back, Retaliates to Kim K’s Suit Over Alleged Misappropriation of Her Celebrity Persona
  • Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada
  • Jailbreaking Exemption to Expire in 2012
  • Grooveshark Sued: Will the Safe Harbor Shield it from Liability?

Twitter

  • The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent - http://t.co/1uHllGB8 by Brandon Marsh
  • Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada - http://t.co/c1We3GjL by Carrie Sager
  • Jailbreaking Exemption to Expire in 2012 - http://t.co/nLWKOJcI by Alexandra Mackey
  • Grooveshark Sued: Will the Safe Harbor Shield it from Liability? - http://t.co/Lu88Zjs7 by Corsica Smith
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License