• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Patents

Judge Rules Against Generic Drug Manufacturers in Crestor Patent Challenge

Submitted by Greg Lultschik on June 30, 2010 – 8:35 AM472No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F06%2F30%2Fjudge-rules-against-generic-drug-manufacturers-in-crestor-patent-challenge%2FJudge+Rules+Against+Generic+Drug+Manufacturers+in+Crestor+Patent+Challenge2010-06-30+13%3A35%3A26Greg+Lultschikhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D472

As news surrounding the major pharmaceutical has become less than cheerful lately in the wake of Merck’s loss over Fosamax and new studies linking Glaxo’s blockbuster diabetes drug Avandia to heart-failure, the industry should enjoy some relief today from AstraZeneca’s successful defense of its own blockbuster cholesterol drug, Crestor. Several generics manufacturers had challenged the Crestor patent on grounds that the invention was obvious to anyone skilled in the art of drug development. The victory was critical for the company, since Crestor sales in the U.S. alone topped $2.1 billion in 2009. The news will not be taken so favorably however, by patients hoping to see a cheap generic version on the market soon. The key patent on the drug isn’t set to expire before 2016, and the challenging companies haven’t issued any statements on their plans for the case from this point forward.

With its cholesterol drug safe for the moment, and the hotdog and cheeseburger laden days of the 4th of July and beyond quickly approaching, it might come as no surprise that AstraZeneca stock jumped 9% on the news.

Greg Lultschik

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Greg Lultschik

Greg is a 3L at the Washington College of Law, and is interested in patent and copyright law. Greg holds a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Pittsburgh, and hopes to work in the area of biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents.

Greg Lultschik has written 23 posts for the IPB.

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright

3D printing is the hot new topic in the tech world and with it come some possible issues related to safeguarding intellectual property. This two part post evaluates the possible issues that may arise due to 3D printing and why there isn’t any cause for alarm, yet.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business

Shortly after the oral arguments between Monsanto and Bowman, WCL hosted both parties for a post argument discussion. Recently the Supreme Court ruled on the case, requiring annual purchases of Monsanto’s soybeans.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?

Following the explosions on April 15, “Boston Strong” emerged as a viral hashtag on Twitter, a rallying cry at public events, and a logo on all kinds of apparels. It does not take too long for business opportunists to take advantage of this national tragedy.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

Any Object, Anytime, Anywhere To Patent or Not To Patent, That is The Question: Embryonic Stem Cell Patents Rejected in Europe Tolkien Estate Involved in Lawsuit over Use of Tolkien’s Image and Characters Sony Takes Aim At... Practically Everyone Village Person Holsters his Pistol and Dances into Court Diversity and IP on the Federal Circuit Ludicrous Penalties for Ludacris? Sony BMG v. Tenenbaum Float Like a Butterfly, Sting like a Lawsuit: Toys “R” Us Joins the Tablet Wars Smartphone Software Duking it Out.  Again. This Chocolaty App Is For The Birds Amidst SOPA and DMCA, Comedian Louis C.K. Speaks to Artists’ Relationship with Pirates Pay-for-Delay Settlements: When Patent Principles Trump Antitrust Concerns . . . And Should They?
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • 3D Printing and Intellectual Property: Copyright
  • Can “Boston Strong” be Trademarked?
  • Bowman Decision a Win for Big Business
  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License