• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog, Featured

Major Media Companies File Amicus Brief in Support of Google

Submitted by Eric Perrott on May 28, 2010 – 4:15 PM3132 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F05%2F28%2Fmajor-media-companies-file-amicus-brief-in-support-of-google%2FMajor+Media+Companies+File+Amicus+Brief+in+Support+of+Google2010-05-28+21%3A15%3A28Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D313

Today Ebay, Yahoo, IAC, and Facebook filed amicus briefs, asking a judge in federal court to dismiss Viacom’s copyright infringement lawsuit against Google’s YouTube video-sharing website. YouTube is seeking summary judgment in the case, citing the safe-harbor provision in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.  Normally, this provision is used for internet service providers, which prevents media companies from holding the service provider accountable for the copyright-infringement of the service company’s users. YouTube would like the judge to extend this to websites, whose users enjoy similar autonomy when creating digital media.

“The Plaintiff’s legal arguments . . . would retard the development of the Internet and electronic commerce,” said Asim Bhansali, an attorney representing the four companies.

Viacom claims that YouTube displayed over 60,000 copyrighted works on its website without authorization.

By Eric Perrott

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Eric Perrott

Eric is a Washington College of Law alumnus and was the 2011-2012 Editor-in-Chief of the IPBrief. Eric enjoys writing and playing music with his band, movies, and eating.

Eric Perrott has written 44 posts for the IPB.

3132 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F05%2F28%2Fmajor-media-companies-file-amicus-brief-in-support-of-google%2FMajor+Media+Companies+File+Amicus+Brief+in+Support+of+Google2010-05-28+21%3A15%3A28Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D313 »

  • Ali says:
    June 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM

    Does YouTube not yet have the safe harbor protection? I was under the impression that they were free from liability, as long as they remove videos when they receive a take-down request from the copyright owner.

    Reply to this comment »
  • {tiffany and co outlet says:
    April 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM

    Howdy, I do believe your blog may be having browser compatibility problems.
    Whenever I look at your blog in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in I.

    E., it has some overlapping issues. I simply wanted to give you a quick
    heads up! Aside from that, great website!

    Reply to this comment »

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

The Future of Copyright Law Velvet Underground Loses Claim Against Andy Warhol Foundation Over Banana Image Balkanization of the Local Patent Rules and a Proposal to Balance Uniformity and Local Experimentation Nike, the “Sufficiently Similar” Standard for Trademark Dilution, and Thou Shall Not Suffer the “Death of a Thousand Cuts.” Going for the Gold in Trademark Enforcement: Olympic Branding Game of Thrones Season 3 Premiere Sets Record for Piracy Former Microsoft CTO’s Quest for Innovation Leads to Patents, Patent Trolling “Pretzel Crisp” Manufacturer Faces Trademark Challenge California Computer Wars: Trademark Infringement Between Facebook and Google+ In Trademark Dispute, Cricket Beats GSM Cellular
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
  • Oh, That’s Different … Never mind: USPTO Withdraws Ruling that IPAD MINI is “Merely Descriptive”

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License