• Home
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
  • Vol. 3, Issue 2
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Video

Blog posts featuring video clips.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Home » Daily Blog, Trademark

eBay Defeats Tiffany & Co.’s Claims of Trademark Infringement and Dilution on Appeal

Submitted by Brooke on April 5, 2010 – 1:55 PM10No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F04%2F05%2Febay-defeats-tiffany-co-%25e2%2580%2599s-claims-of-trademark-infringement-and-dilution-on-appeal%2FeBay+Defeats+Tiffany+%26+Co.%E2%80%99s+Claims+of+Trademark+Infringement+and+Dilution+on+Appeal2010-04-05+18%3A55%3A55Brookehttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D10

Recently, a U.S. Appeals Court found eBay innocent of claims by Tiffany & Co. of trademark infringement and dilution.  Such accusations arose after Tiffany & Co. discovered counterfeit merchandise for sale on eBay’s auction site.  Tiffany & Co. also quarreled with eBay’s advertising mechanisms, asserting that eBay suggested that the goods sold were “peddled Tiffany goods,” although many were actually just counterfeit goods⎯constituting false advertisement.

The court struck down the arguments of trademark infringement and dilution, as eBay itself did not sell the goods, but rather fraudulent vendors did.  However, because eBay affirmatively advertised the counterfeit goods through its site at peddled Tiffany merchandise, the court ordered further proceedings.
Written by Brooke Ericson
TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Brooke Ericson

Brooke Ericson is a 3L at American University Washington College of Law. She is a former judicial intern for the Honorable Judge Holeman and legal intern for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and the Federal Communications Commission’s Enforcement Bureau. She currently works as a law clerk for Commissioner Robert M. McDowell at the FCC. Besides writing for the IP Brief, she is a Note and Comment Editor for the Administrative Law Review.

Brooke Ericson has written 2 posts for the IPB.

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada

Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada

Despite the tremendous opposition to SOPA and PIPA in the United States, lobbyists are pushing Canada to incorporate SOPA-like provisions into Bill C-11, Canada’s latest attempt to toughen their copyright protections. Michael Geist, a Canadian …

More articles »

Patents »

Kodak: An Example of What Not to do With Your Patents.

Kodak: An Example of What Not to do With Your Patents.

Kodak has been buying up patents for a technology that competes with its old film technology in order to keep its dying film market alive. However, its impending bankruptcy most likely means that only the patents it holds can save it.

More articles »

Trademark »

The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent

The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent

Louboutin appeals a trial court’s decision to not enforce protection for his trademarked red soles. The trial court’s decision and the appeal highlight some interesting issues surrounding color trademark protection. The appellate court should not grant Louboutin trademark protection of his red soles because it could impermissibly hurt competition.

More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

No Easy Money for Easy Art Fall 2010 – Vol. 2, Issue 2 is now available! Any Object, Anytime, Anywhere Who Owns Students’ Class Notes?  California State University System Slaps NoteUtopia.com Entrepreneur with Cease and Desist Letter A Needle in a Haystack: A Case of Criminal Charges for Copyright Infringement Will the Court Answer IHOP’s Prayer for Relief? Google to Restrict “Jailbroken” Android Phones From Accessing New YouTube Features German Court Rules YouTube Fails to Meet Copyright Protection Standards: How Much is Enough? Tootsie Roll Isn’t So Sweet on Footzyrolls Paul Allen is the new He Who Shall Not be Named.
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent
  • Keep Off Kardashians! The Gap Fights Back, Retaliates to Kim K’s Suit Over Alleged Misappropriation of Her Celebrity Persona
  • Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada
  • Jailbreaking Exemption to Expire in 2012
  • Grooveshark Sued: Will the Safe Harbor Shield it from Liability?

Twitter

  • The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent - http://t.co/1uHllGB8 by Brandon Marsh
  • Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada - http://t.co/c1We3GjL by Carrie Sager
  • Jailbreaking Exemption to Expire in 2012 - http://t.co/nLWKOJcI by Alexandra Mackey
  • Grooveshark Sued: Will the Safe Harbor Shield it from Liability? - http://t.co/Lu88Zjs7 by Corsica Smith
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License