• Home
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
  • Vol. 3, Issue 2
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Video

Blog posts featuring video clips.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Home » Archive by Month

Article Archive for April 2010

IBM Faces Antitrust Claim Before European Commission
April 23, 2010 – 3:40 PM | 842 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F04%2F23%2Fibm-faces-antitrust-claim-before-european-commission%2FIBM+Faces+Antitrust+Claim+Before+European+Commission2010-04-23+20%3A40%3A34Daniel+Leehttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D84
IBM Faces Antitrust Claim Before European Commission

An antitrust claim was brought by France based TurboHercules SAS against IBM – a leading open source software maker – before the European Commission.  In 1999, the TurboHercules open source project team created an “emulator” …

Verizon Loses Appeal on Phone Technology Patents by not Speaking up in Court
April 19, 2010 – 3:39 PM | 82No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F04%2F19%2Fverizon-loses-appeal-on-phone-technology-patents-by-not-speaking-up-in-court%2FVerizon+Loses+Appeal+on+Phone+Technology+Patents+by+not+Speaking+up+in+Court2010-04-19+20%3A39%3A43Brett+Havranekhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D82

On April 16, 2010, the Federal Circuit denied Verizon’s request for a new trial in its patent infringement litigation against Cox, Inc.  Verizon holds a number of patents regarding packet-switched telephone systems.  This technology is …

“Wii Didn’t Infringe,” Says Nintendo- Federal Circuit Agrees
April 19, 2010 – 3:37 PM | 80No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F04%2F19%2F%25e2%2580%259cwii-didn%25e2%2580%2599t-infringe%25e2%2580%259d-says-nintendo-federal-circuit-agrees%2F%E2%80%9CWii+Didn%E2%80%99t+Infringe%2C%E2%80%9D+Says+Nintendo-+Federal+Circuit+Agrees2010-04-19+20%3A37%3A26Brett+Havranekhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D80

On April 13, 2010, the Federal Circuit found that the Nintendo Wii did not infringe a patent held by Anascape, Ltd.  The Nintendo Wii is a popular gaming console which has sold millions of units …

Beijing Revises Purchasing Policies
April 18, 2010 – 3:31 PM | 72No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F04%2F18%2Fbeijing-revises-purchasing-policies%2FBeijing+Revises+Purchasing+Policies2010-04-18+20%3A31%3A32Jeesun+Kimhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D72

Proving that the Chinese government does listen to the concerns of foreign companies, on April 13, 2010 the Ministry of Science and Technology of China published the draft of a series of new rules on …

The North Face and The South Butt Reach a Settlement
April 17, 2010 – 3:32 PM | 75One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F04%2F17%2Fthe-north-face-and-the-south-butt-reach-a-settlement%2FThe+North+Face+and+The+South+Butt+Reach+a+Settlement2010-04-17+20%3A32%3A58Jeesun+Kimhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D75
The North Face and The South Butt Reach a Settlement

On April 9, 2010, The North Face Apparel Corp. settled its lawsuit against The South Butt, a company run by Jimmy Winkelmann, an 18-year-old college student at the University of Missouri-Columbia.
The South Butt sells T-shirts, …

Superheroes in Battle
April 12, 2010 – 2:27 PM | 25One Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F04%2F12%2Fsuperheroes-in-battle%2FSuperheroes+in+Battle2010-04-12+14%3A27%3A50Matilda+Bilsteinhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D25
Superheroes in Battle

The heirs of Jack Kirby, the creator of many of Marvel’s super hero characters, are suing Marvel over copyright ownership.  They have enlisted the help of Marc Toberoff, the same Los Angeles lawyer who helped …

Chinese Trade Secret Case Answers Few Questions
April 12, 2010 – 2:21 PM | 22No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F04%2F12%2Fchinese-trade-secret-case-answers-few-questions%2FChinese+Trade+Secret+Case+Answers+Few+Questions2010-04-12+19%3A21%3A31Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D22
Chinese Trade Secret Case Answers Few Questions

On April 29th, 2010, China sentenced Australian-citizen Stern Hu, an executive at the British/Australian Rio Tinto Company, to 10 years in prison.   In January, the Chinese government detained several employees of the British-Australian company in …

Wi-LAN Sues 19 Electronics Companies Over Bluetooth Patents
April 12, 2010 – 2:05 PM | 41No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F04%2F12%2Fwi-lan-sues-19-electronics-companies-over-bluetooth-patents%2FWi-LAN+Sues+19+Electronics+Companies+Over+Bluetooth+Patents2010-04-12+19%3A05%3A25Ellen+Wonghttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D41

On April 7, 2010, Wi-LAN, a Canadian wireless technology company, filed suit against 19 consumer electronics companies alleging patent infringement.  The list of accused companies includes Apple, Intel, Dell, Lenovo, Acer, and Sony, as well …

Patent and Reverse Engineering by Consumers: What Is the Permitted Line of Fair Use?
April 9, 2010 – 2:02 PM | 39No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F04%2F09%2Fpatent-and-reverse-engineering-by-consumers-what-is-the-permitted-line-of-fair-use%2FPatent+and+Reverse+Engineering+by+Consumers%3A++What+Is+the+Permitted+Line+of+Fair+Use%3F2010-04-09+19%3A02%3A03Daniel+Leehttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D39

Consumer electronics utilize numerous patents filed by their developers. One of the emerging issues involving these patented machineries is reverse engineering by consumers. Consumers who are skilled enough to hack into the source codes of …

“Nooks and Crannies” to Remain Secret
April 7, 2010 – 2:06 PM | 152 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F04%2F07%2Fnooks-and-crannies-to-remain-secret%2F%22Nooks+and+Crannies%22+to+Remain+Secret+2010-04-07+14%3A06%3A16Eric+Perrotthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D15
“Nooks and Crannies” to Remain Secret

On February 7, 2010, U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick, the judge presiding over the Bimbo Bakeries v. Botticella trade secret dispute, granted a preliminary injunction against Chris Botticella, a former senior vice president at …

Page 1 of 212

Copyright »

Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada

Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada

Despite the tremendous opposition to SOPA and PIPA in the United States, lobbyists are pushing Canada to incorporate SOPA-like provisions into Bill C-11, Canada’s latest attempt to toughen their copyright protections. Michael Geist, a Canadian …

More articles »

Patents »

Kodak: An Example of What Not to do With Your Patents.

Kodak: An Example of What Not to do With Your Patents.

Kodak has been buying up patents for a technology that competes with its old film technology in order to keep its dying film market alive. However, its impending bankruptcy most likely means that only the patents it holds can save it.

More articles »

Trademark »

The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent

The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent

Louboutin appeals a trial court’s decision to not enforce protection for his trademarked red soles. The trial court’s decision and the appeal highlight some interesting issues surrounding color trademark protection. The appellate court should not grant Louboutin trademark protection of his red soles because it could impermissibly hurt competition.

More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Recent Posts

  • The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent
  • Keep Off Kardashians! The Gap Fights Back, Retaliates to Kim K’s Suit Over Alleged Misappropriation of Her Celebrity Persona
  • Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada
  • Jailbreaking Exemption to Expire in 2012
  • Grooveshark Sued: Will the Safe Harbor Shield it from Liability?

Twitter

  • The Power of Red: The Shoe Showdown Between Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent - http://t.co/1uHllGB8 by Brandon Marsh
  • Go North, Young Bill: The SOPAfication of Canada - http://t.co/c1We3GjL by Carrie Sager
  • Jailbreaking Exemption to Expire in 2012 - http://t.co/nLWKOJcI by Alexandra Mackey
  • Grooveshark Sued: Will the Safe Harbor Shield it from Liability? - http://t.co/Lu88Zjs7 by Corsica Smith
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License