• Home
  • 1st Annual Symposium
  • About
  • Available Positions
  • Issues
    • Vol. 4 Issue 2
    • Vol. 4 Issue 1
    • Vol. 3 Issue 3
    • Vol. 3, Issue 2
    • Vol. 3, Issue 1
    • Vol. 2, Issue 3
    • Vol. 2, Issue 2
    • Vol. 2, Issue 1
    • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Staff
    • 2009-2010 Staff
    • 2010-2011 Staff
    • 2011-2012 Staff
    • 2012-2013 Staff
  • Submissions
  • Subscribe
Featured Article

A featured article from the current issue of the Intellectual Property Brief.

Daily Blog

A daily blog of IP-related news and issues

Articles

All of the Intellectual Property Brief’s published articles. All articles are hand-selected from outside submissions and from our very own IPB staff members.

Issues

PDF versions of each of the Intellectual Property Brief’s issues.

Short Circuit

Case-by-case summaries of intellectual property related opinions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Home » Daily Blog

Google and Yahoo Avoid Infringement Suit on User-Data Generated Search Method

Submitted by Rachel Gordon on March 25, 2010 – 1:43 PM32No Commenthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F2010%2F03%2F25%2Fgoogle-and-yahoo-avoid-infringement-suit-on-user-data-generated-search-method%2FGoogle+and+Yahoo+Avoid+Infringement+Suit+on+User-Data+Generated+Search+Method2010-03-25+18%3A43%3A51Rachel+Gordonhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipbrief.net%2F%3Fp%3D32

In a case decided on March 11, 2010, nXn (formerly “PA Advisors”) filed suit against Google, Yahoo, and several other defendants alleging infringement of nXn’s patent for a “System and Method for Generating Personalized User Profiles and for Utilizing the Generated User Profiles to Perform Adaptive Internet Searches.”

The Internet searching technology “reflects the user’s cultural, educational, and social backgrounds and the user’s psychological profile” based on historic linguistic patterns identified in the user’s prior activity.

Defendants Google, Inc., and Yahoo!, Inc., moved for summary judgment of noninfringement based on 2 arguments: (1) that none of the accused services extracted “segment[s] representative of a linguistic pattern”; and (2) that the accused’s products did not “provid[e], by the user to the local computer system, search request data . . . .”

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas agreed with the Defendants’ arguments and held that the idea that the system only requires identifying words without reference to parts of speech finds no support in nXn’s patent. The patent repeatedly disparages prior art search engines that operate by running “word” searches.  Furthermore, neither Google’s nor Yahoo’s system “initiates” any search.  They only offer suggestions and spelling changes after the user has begun a search query.  As a result, the court granted the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

By Ellen Wong

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare

About the Author:

Author: Rachel Gordon

Rachel Gordon is a 3L at WCL with an interest in IP Law, Food and Drug Law and Health Law. Rachel serves as the co-Symposium and Events Editor for the IP Brief and the Technology Director for the Health Law and Justice Initiative. Her legal work experience includes working as a Dean's Fellow for the WCL Office of International Exchange and Study Abroad and a Research Assistant for the Health Law and Policy Institute. In August 2011, Rachel will join the WCL General Practice Clinic as a student attorney. Rachel holds a B.S. in Food Science, Operations and Management from Cornell University. She is originally from Long Island, New York.

Rachel Gordon has written 5 posts for the IPB.

Leave a comment!

Click here to cancel reply »

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Copyright »

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Appropriating Sid Vicious

Mr. Brainwash’s works recently joined the increasing number of cases on appropriation art after photographer Dennis Morris sued the street artist for use of his 1977 picture of Sid Vicious.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Patents »

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent decision, which reasoned that the drug posed public health and safety concerns, creates serious patent implications with regard to generic drugs.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Trademark »

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million

Supreme, one of the most coveted skate-inspired clothing brands, is suing women’s clothing brand Married to the Mob and its founder Leah McSweeney for trademark infringement to the tune of $10 million.

TwitterFacebookGoogle GmailGoogle ReaderDiggPrintBookmark/FavoritesShare
More articles »

Facebook

Accepting Submissions

The IP Brief is currently accepting submissions. We are looking for papers that address a legal topic relating to any area of intellectual property. Please submit completed papers and a cover page with the name and title of the article to ipbrief [at] wcl.american.edu. Any questions can also be sent to this e-mail address.

Blogroll

  • American University Washington College of Law
  • Carrollogos
  • Copyright Blog
  • GamePolitics
  • Intellectual Property Watch
  • PatentlyO
  • Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
  • Spicy IP
  • The TTABlog®
  • ©ollectanea

Tags

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010

Random Posts

The DMCA Called - Why Unlocking Your Cellphone May Now Be Illegal IP Theft Breakdown Taking a Bite Out of the Apple: “Appstore” Trademark Infringement Update Angry College Athletes Sue Videogame Company For Using Their Image Stevie Wonder Makes Pitch To U.N. To Ease Copyrights For The Blind Fight Against Piracy Continues - Next on the List … Digital Storage Sites Vringo Seeking Royalty Rate Increase Spanish Court Rules in Favor of YouTube in Copyright Case “Where There Is A Sea There Are Pirates.”  The Pirate Bay Threatens To Live Up To Its Name Live Former Lead Singer Ed Kowalczyk Sued by his Own Band Operation Fake Sweep: Protecting the NFL Brand Kanye West Sued for Unauthorized Sampling in “Gold digger”: Was He Messin’ With Someone Else’s Song?
(refresh random posts)

Latest Video Post

Relatively New Anti-Piracy PSA: Another Analogy Comparison of Piracy to Stealing Cars or an Effective Message?

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Sues Married to the Mob for $10 Million
  • Appropriating Sid Vicious
  • Chick-Fil-A’s ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ Trumps Kale-Promotion Slogan
  • Oxycontin and the Implications of Pay-For-Delay
  • Oh, That’s Different … Never mind: USPTO Withdraws Ruling that IPAD MINI is “Merely Descriptive”

Twitter

  • No public Twitter messages.
  • Copy / Paste
  • Site Search
  • Wikipedia
  • Google
  • Facts
  • Amazon
  • eBay
  • Outlook
  • Gmail
  • Y! Mail
  • Twitter
  • Search & Share
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia Premium theme by Colorlabs Project
The American University Intellectual Property Brief is licensed by the staff of the American University Intellectual Property Brief under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. IPBrief.net is hosted by Dan Rosenthal. For technical queries, contact dan@danrosenthal.org

Creative Commons License